RadeonT RX Vega 11 vs Quadro 5000
RadeonT RX Vega 11
Popular choices:
Quadro 5000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 5000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RadeonT RX Vega 11 is significantly newer (2018 vs 2011). The RadeonT RX Vega 11 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro 5000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro 5000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (3 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RadeonT RX Vega 11.
| Insight | RadeonT RX Vega 11 | Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro 5000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RadeonT RX Vega 11 and Quadro 5000
RadeonT RX Vega 11
The RadeonT RX Vega 11 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1251 MHz. It has 704 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,917 points.
Quadro 5000
The Quadro 5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 23 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 513 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 152W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,963 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
The RadeonT RX Vega 11 scores 1,917 and the Quadro 5000 reaches 1,963 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RadeonT RX Vega 11 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Quadro 5000 uses Fermi, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 704 (RadeonT RX Vega 11) vs 352 (Quadro 5000). Raw compute: 1.761 TFLOPS (RadeonT RX Vega 11) vs 0.7223 TFLOPS (Quadro 5000).
| Feature | RadeonT RX Vega 11 | Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,917 | 1,963+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 704+100% | 352 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.761 TFLOPS+144% | 0.7223 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 40+400% |
| TMUs | 44 | 44 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RadeonT RX Vega 11 | Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RadeonT RX Vega 11 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 5000 has 3 GB. The Quadro 5000 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | RadeonT RX Vega 11 | Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The RadeonT RX Vega 11 draws 35W versus the Quadro 5000's 152W — a 125.1% difference. The RadeonT RX Vega 11 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (RadeonT RX Vega 11) vs 350W (Quadro 5000). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | RadeonT RX Vega 11 | Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-77% | 152W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 54.8+325% | 12.9 |
Value Analysis
The RadeonT RX Vega 11 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Quadro 5000 launched at $2499 and now averages $100. The RadeonT RX Vega 11 costs 100+% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (RadeonT RX Vega 11) vs 19.6 (Quadro 5000) — the RadeonT RX Vega 11 offers Infinity% better value. The RadeonT RX Vega 11 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2011).
| Feature | RadeonT RX Vega 11 | Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $2499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 19.6 |
| Codename | Raven | GF100 |
| Release | May 10 2018 | February 23 2011 |
| Ranking | #673 | #687 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RadeonT RX Vega 11 and Quadro 5000
