CPU
GPU
RadeonT RX Vega 11
Popular choices:
Iris Xe Graphics MAX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Iris Xe Graphics MAX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RadeonT RX Vega 11.
| Insight | RadeonT RX Vega 11 | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Xe Graphics MAX remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RadeonT RX Vega 11 and Iris Xe Graphics MAX
RadeonT RX Vega 11
The RadeonT RX Vega 11 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1251 MHz. It has 704 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,917 points.
Iris Xe Graphics MAX
The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 31 2020. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1650 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,972 points.
Graphics Performance
The RadeonT RX Vega 11 scores 1,917 and the Iris Xe Graphics MAX reaches 1,972 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RadeonT RX Vega 11 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Iris Xe Graphics MAX uses Generation 12.1, both on 14 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 704 (RadeonT RX Vega 11) vs 768 (Iris Xe Graphics MAX). Raw compute: 1.761 TFLOPS (RadeonT RX Vega 11) vs 2.534 TFLOPS (Iris Xe Graphics MAX). Boost clocks: 1251 MHz vs 1650 MHz.
| Feature | RadeonT RX Vega 11 | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,917 | 1,972+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Generation 12.1 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 704 | 768+9% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.761 TFLOPS | 2.534 TFLOPS+44% |
| Boost Clock | 1251 MHz | 1650 MHz+32% |
| ROPs | 8 | 24+200% |
| TMUs | 44 | 48+9% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RadeonT RX Vega 11 | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | RadeonT RX Vega 11 | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The RadeonT RX Vega 11 draws 35W versus the Iris Xe Graphics MAX's 25W — a 33.3% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (RadeonT RX Vega 11) vs 1W (Iris Xe Graphics MAX). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.
| Feature | RadeonT RX Vega 11 | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W | 25W-29% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W | 1W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 54.8 | 78.9+44% |
Value Analysis
The RadeonT RX Vega 11 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Iris Xe Graphics MAX launched at $55 and now averages $40. The RadeonT RX Vega 11 costs 100+% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (RadeonT RX Vega 11) vs 49.3 (Iris Xe Graphics MAX) — the RadeonT RX Vega 11 offers Infinity% better value. The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | RadeonT RX Vega 11 | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $55 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 49.3 |
| Codename | Raven | DG1 |
| Release | May 10 2018 | October 31 2020 |
| Ranking | #673 | #685 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RadeonT RX Vega 11 and Iris Xe Graphics MAX
