GeForce RTX 3050 8GB vs GeForce GTS 450
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:
GeForce GTS 450
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTS 450
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is significantly newer (2022 vs 2010). The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTS 450 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 837.5% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (8 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTS 450.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | GeForce GTS 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+837.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-837.5%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTS 450 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $20 versus $209 for the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB, it costs 90% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 11.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | GeForce GTS 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+11.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($209) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 8GB and GeForce GTS 450
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.
GeForce GTS 450
The GeForce GTS 450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,337 points. Launch price was $129.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB scores 12,535 versus the GeForce GTS 450's 1,337 — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB leads by 837.5%. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is built on Ampere while the GeForce GTS 450 uses Fermi, both on 8 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 192 (GeForce GTS 450). Raw compute: 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 450).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | GeForce GTS 450 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,535+838% | 1,337 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Fermi |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+1233% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 9.098 TFLOPS+1413% | 0.6013 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+150% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+900% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce GTS 450 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | GeForce GTS 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTS 450 has 1 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce GTS 450) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | GeForce GTS 450 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+700% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs H.264 (GeForce GTS 450).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | GeForce GTS 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | — |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | — |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB draws 130W versus the GeForce GTS 450's 106W — a 20.3% difference. The GeForce GTS 450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 400W (GeForce GTS 450). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | GeForce GTS 450 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 106W-18% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 400W-11% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 66°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 96.4+665% | 12.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $209, while the GeForce GTS 450 launched at $129 and now averages $20. The GeForce GTS 450 costs 90.4% less ($189 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 60.0 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 66.8 (GeForce GTS 450) — the GeForce GTS 450 offers 11.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | GeForce GTS 450 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $129-48% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $209 | $20-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 60.0 | 66.8+11% |
| Codename | GA106 | GF106 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | September 13 2010 |
| Ranking | #211 | #791 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3050 8GB and GeForce GTS 450
