
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB

GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 460 768MB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is significantly newer (2022 vs 0). The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 460 768MB lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 161.1% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 460 768MB.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | GeForce GTX 460 768MB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+161.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-161.1%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | Fermi (2010−2014) (Standard Node) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 8GB and GeForce GTX 460 768MB

GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.

GeForce GTX 460 768MB
The GeForce GTX 460 768MB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in sem dados. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,800 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB scores 12,535 versus the GeForce GTX 460 768MB's 4,800 — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB leads by 161.1%. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is built on Ampere while the GeForce GTX 460 768MB uses Fermi. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 336 (GeForce GTX 460 768MB).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | GeForce GTX 460 768MB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,535+161% | 4,800 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Fermi |
| Shading Units | 2560+662% | 336 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce GTX 460 768MB relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | GeForce GTX 460 768MB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 460 768MB has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 86.4 GB/s (GeForce GTX 460 768MB) — a 159.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | GeForce GTX 460 768MB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s+159% | 86.4 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 460 768MB). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | GeForce GTX 460 768MB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 460 768MB). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 460 768MB).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | GeForce GTX 460 768MB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB draws 130W versus the GeForce GTX 460 768MB's 75W — a 53.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 460 768MB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 460 768MB). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 210mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 66°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | GeForce GTX 460 768MB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 75W-42% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 450W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 210mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 66°C-6% | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 96.4+51% | 64.0 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















