GeForce RTX 3050 8GB vs Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Performance Per Dollar Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 127.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake).
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+127.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-127.9%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | Xe LPG (2023) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $209 (vs $100), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 9% better value per dollar than the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake).
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($209) | ✅More affordable ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 8GB and Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB scores 12,535 versus the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)'s 5,500 — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB leads by 127.9%. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is built on Ampere while the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) uses Xe LPG, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 4 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1950 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,535+128% | 5,500 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Xe LPG |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+63900% | 4 |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz | 1950 MHz+10% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+233% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 12 Ultimate (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs Xe Media Engine (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB draws 130W versus the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)'s 15W — a 158.6% difference. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 350W (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 66°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 15W-88% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 66°C-22% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 96.4 | 366.7+280% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $209, while the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) launched at $300 and now averages $100. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) costs 52.2% less ($109 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 60.0 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 55.0 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 9.1% better value. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-17% | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $209 | $100-52% |
| Performance per Dollar | 60.0+9% | 55.0 |
| Codename | GA106 | Meteor Lake iGPU |
| Release | January 4 2022 | December 14 2023 |
| Ranking | #211 | #496 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3050 8GB and Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
