GeForce RTX 3050 8GB vs RTX A1000
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:
RTX A1000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Performance Per Dollar RTX A1000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 15.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX A1000.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+15.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-15.9%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $209 versus $500 for the RTX A1000, it costs 58% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 177.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+177.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($209) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 8GB and RTX A1000
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.
RTX A1000
The RTX A1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1462 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,814 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB scores 12,535 versus the RTX A1000's 10,814 — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB leads by 15.9%. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is built on Ampere while the RTX A1000 uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 2,304 (RTX A1000). Raw compute: 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 6.737 TFLOPS (RTX A1000). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1462 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 18 (RTX A1000) with 80 Tensor cores vs 72.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,535+16% | 10,814 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+11% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 9.098 TFLOPS+35% | 6.737 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+22% | 1462 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80+11% | 72 |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+9% | 2.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20+11% | 18 |
| Tensor Cores | 80+11% | 72 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The RTX A1000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 12.2 (RTX A1000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A1000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A1000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB draws 130W versus the RTX A1000's 50W — a 88.9% difference. The RTX A1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 500W (RTX A1000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 163mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 66°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 50W-62% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 163mm |
| Height | 112mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 66°C-12% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 96.4 | 216.3+124% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $209, while the RTX A1000 launched at $749 and now averages $500. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB costs 58.2% less ($291 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 60.0 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 21.6 (RTX A1000) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 177.8% better value. The RTX A1000 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-67% | $749 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $209-58% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 60.0+178% | 21.6 |
| Codename | GA106 | GA107 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | April 16 2024 |
| Ranking | #211 | #251 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3050 8GB and RTX A1000
