GeForce RTX 3050 8GB vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Performance Per Dollar Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 269.8% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+269.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-269.8%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $209 for the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB, it costs 76% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 13% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+13%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($209) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 8GB and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,390 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB scores 12,535 versus the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7's 3,390 — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB leads by 269.8%. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is built on Ampere while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 8 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 96 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,535+270% | 3,390 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+2567% | 96 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 12.1 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs QuickSync (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | QuickSync |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB draws 130W versus the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7's 30W — a 125% difference. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 350W (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 66°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 30W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 66°C-22% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 96.4 | 113.0+17% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $209, while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 launched at $100 and now averages $50. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 costs 76.1% less ($159 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 60.0 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 67.8 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) — the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 offers 13% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $100-60% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $209 | $50-76% |
| Performance per Dollar | 60.0 | 67.8+13% |
| Codename | GA106 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Release | January 4 2022 | August 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #211 | #508 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3050 8GB and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
