GeForce RTX 3050 8GB vs TITAN RTX
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:
TITAN RTX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The TITAN RTX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 60.3% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (24 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-60.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+60.3%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+200%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $209 versus $1,203.96 for the TITAN RTX, it costs 83% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 259.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+259.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($209) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,203.96) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 8GB and TITAN RTX
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.
TITAN RTX
The TITAN RTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 18 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 280W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,095 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB scores 12,535 versus the TITAN RTX's 20,095 — the TITAN RTX leads by 60.3%. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is built on Ampere while the TITAN RTX uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 4,608 (TITAN RTX). Raw compute: 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 16.31 TFLOPS (TITAN RTX). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1770 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 72 (TITAN RTX) with 80 Tensor cores vs 576.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,535 | 20,095+60% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 4608+80% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 9.098 TFLOPS | 16.31 TFLOPS+79% |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 80 | 288+260% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 4.5 MB+80% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 72+260% |
| Tensor Cores | 80 | 576+620% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The TITAN RTX relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the TITAN RTX has 24 GB. The TITAN RTX offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 672 GB/s (TITAN RTX) — a 200% advantage for the TITAN RTX. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 6 MB (TITAN RTX) — the TITAN RTX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 24 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 672 GB/s+200% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 12 Ultimate (TITAN RTX). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (TITAN RTX). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC (4th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (TITAN RTX).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | NVENC (7th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC (4th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB draws 130W versus the TITAN RTX's 280W — a 73.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 650W (TITAN RTX). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 66°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-54% | 280W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-31% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 116mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 66°C-18% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 96.4+34% | 71.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $209, while the TITAN RTX launched at $2499 and now averages $1203.96. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB costs 82.6% less ($995 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 60.0 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 16.7 (TITAN RTX) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 259.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-90% | $2499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $209-83% | $1203.96 |
| Performance per Dollar | 60.0+259% | 16.7 |
| Codename | GA106 | TU102 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | December 18 2018 |
| Ranking | #211 | #91 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3050 8GB and TITAN RTX
