GeForce RTX 3050 8GB vs TITAN V
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:
TITAN V
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The TITAN V lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The TITAN V is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 60.2% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (12 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-60.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+60.2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Volta) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $209 versus $1,045 for the TITAN V, it costs 80% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 212.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+212.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($209) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,045) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 8GB and TITAN V
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.
TITAN V
The TITAN V is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2017. It features the Volta architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1455 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,077 points. Launch price was $2,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB scores 12,535 versus the TITAN V's 20,077 — the TITAN V leads by 60.2%. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is built on Ampere while the TITAN V uses Volta, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 5,120 (TITAN V). Raw compute: 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 14.9 TFLOPS (TITAN V). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1455 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,535 | 20,077+60% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Volta |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 5120+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 9.098 TFLOPS | 14.9 TFLOPS+64% |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+22% | 1455 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 80 | 320+300% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 7.5 MB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4.5 MB+125% |
| Tensor Cores | 80 | 640+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The TITAN V relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the TITAN V has 12 GB. The TITAN V offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 653 GB/s (TITAN V) — a 191.5% advantage for the TITAN V. Bus width: 128-bit vs 3072-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 4.5 MB (TITAN V) — the TITAN V has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 653 GB/s+192% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 3072-bit+2300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4.5 MB+125% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 12.1 (TITAN V). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs NVENC 6.0 (TITAN V). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (TITAN V).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | NVENC 6.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | PureVideo HD VP9 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB draws 130W versus the TITAN V's 250W — a 63.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 600W (TITAN V). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 66°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-48% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-25% | 600W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 66°C-22% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 96.4+20% | 80.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $209, while the TITAN V launched at $2999 and now averages $1045. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB costs 80% less ($836 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 60.0 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) vs 19.2 (TITAN V) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 212.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-92% | $2999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $209-80% | $1045 |
| Performance per Dollar | 60.0+213% | 19.2 |
| Codename | GA106 | GV100 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | December 7 2017 |
| Ranking | #211 | #109 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3050 8GB and TITAN V
