GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
VS
GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020Core: 1410 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

2013Core: 797 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
100%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
96%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
95%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
95%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
95%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
94%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
93%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
93%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
92%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
91%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
90%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
90%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
89%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
88%
#15
Radeon RX 6500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $150
88%
#16
GeForce RTX 3070
MSRP: $499|Avg: $200
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

#375
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1241%
#377
1125%
#378
1122%
#382
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1020%
#383
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1013%
#385
100%
#386
GeForce GT 640M LE
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
100%
#387
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3450U
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
99%
#388
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
99%
#389
HD Graphics 520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $35
98%
#390
Radeon HD 8600/8700M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
98%
#391
Radeon R9 M395X
MSRP: $600|Avg: $150
97%
#393
Radeon R9 M485X
MSRP: $450|Avg: $150
97%
#394
Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
96%
#395
Radeon HD 6650A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
96%
#396
GeForce 920A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
95%
#397
GeForce 930A
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
95%
#398
Mobility Radeon HD 4650
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
93%
#400
Radeon R9 M290X
MSRP: $400|Avg: $60
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is significantly newer (2020 vs 2013). The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 417.2% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition.

InsightGeForce RTX 3060 TiGeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
Performance
Leading raw performance (+417.2%)
Lower raw frame rates (-417.2%)
Longevity
🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

The GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 797 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,927 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition's 3,927 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 417.2%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition uses Kepler, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1,344 (GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2.142 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiGeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
G3D Mark Score
20,312+417%
3,927
Architecture
Ampere
Kepler
Process Node
8 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
4864+262%
1344
Compute (TFLOPS)
16.2 TFLOPS+656%
2.142 TFLOPS
ROPs
80+150%
32
TMUs
152+36%
112
L1 Cache
4.8 MB+4264%
0.11 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB+700%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiGeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2.0
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 160 GB/s (GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition) — a 180% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiGeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+300%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s+180%
160 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit
256-bit
L2 Cache
4 MB+700%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiGeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
TDP
200W
100W-50%
Recommended PSU
600W
350W-42%
Power Connector
8-pin
1x 6-pin
Length
242mm
Height
112mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
101.6+159%
39.3
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiGeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
MSRP
$399
Avg Price (30d)
$280
Codename
GA104
GK104
Release
December 1 2020
November 8 2013
Ranking
#73
#803