
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs GeForce GTX 960A

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 960A
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 960A
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 960A lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 486.2% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 960A.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GeForce GTX 960A |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+486.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-486.2%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $280 (vs $60), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 25.6% better value per dollar than the GeForce GTX 960A.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GeForce GTX 960A |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+25.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($280) | ✅More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and GeForce GTX 960A

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

GeForce GTX 960A
The GeForce GTX 960A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,465 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the GeForce GTX 960A's 3,465 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 486.2%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the GeForce GTX 960A uses Maxwell, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 640 (GeForce GTX 960A). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1.389 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 960A). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1085 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GeForce GTX 960A |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+486% | 3,465 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+660% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+1066% | 1.389 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+53% | 1085 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+400% | 16 |
| TMUs | 152+280% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+1448% | 0.31 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce GTX 960A relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GeForce GTX 960A |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 960A has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 960A) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GeForce GTX 960A |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 960A). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GeForce GTX 960A |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 960A). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs NVDEC 1st Gen.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GeForce GTX 960A |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | NVENC 1st Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | NVDEC 1st Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the GeForce GTX 960A's 75W — a 90.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 960A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 960A). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GeForce GTX 960A |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 75W-63% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 1mm |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+120% | 46.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $280, while the GeForce GTX 960A launched at $199 and now averages $60. The GeForce GTX 960A costs 78.6% less ($220 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 72.5 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 57.8 (GeForce GTX 960A) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 25.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GeForce GTX 960A |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $199-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $280 | $60-79% |
| Performance per Dollar | 72.5+25% | 57.8 |
| Codename | GA104 | GM107 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #73 | #546 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














