GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
VS
Radeon 760M

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon 760M

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020Core: 1410 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon 760M

2024Core: 800 MHzBoost: 2599 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
100%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
96%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
95%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
95%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
95%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
94%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
93%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
93%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
92%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
91%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
90%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
90%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
89%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
88%
#15
Radeon RX 6500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $150
88%
#16
GeForce RTX 3070
MSRP: $499|Avg: $200
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 760M

#61
GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)
MSRP: $800|Avg: $350
99%
#62
GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $350
96%
#284
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
697%
#286
632%
#287
630%
#291
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
573%
#292
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
569%
#294
Radeon 760M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#297
Radeon RX 780
MSRP: $499|Avg: $721
99%
#300
GeForce 940MX
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
97%
#301
GeForce MX130
MSRP: $120|Avg: $50
97%
#302
Arc Graphics 130V
MSRP: $300|Avg: $250
97%
#303
Radeon R5 430
MSRP: $59|Avg: $50
96%
#304
GeForce MX150
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
96%
#307
GeForce MX450
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
96%
#308
Arc Graphics 140V
MSRP: $350|Avg: $300
95%
#309
Radeon R7 A8-8650
MSRP: $49|Avg: $20
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Why is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon 760M?

The battle between the integrated Radeon 760M and the dedicated GeForce RTX 3060 Ti highlights the impressive scale of modern iGPU technology. The Radeon 760M, built on the RDNA 3 architecture, is a world-class integrated solution that can handle light 1080p gaming with impressive efficiency. However, the dedicated RTX 3060 Ti delivers roughly 400-500% more raw compute performance, moving from a mobile compromise to a world-class 1440p powerhouse.

Technically, the Radeon 760M benefits from modern architecture and Ray Tracing support, but it lacks the dedicated VRAM and thermal headroom of a desktop card. The RTX 3060 Ti features 8GB of fast dedicated memory and specialized hardware for DLSS, which provide significantly more fluidity in demanding modern titles. For users moving from a thin-and-light laptop to a dedicated tower, the 3060 Ti provides a level of immersion that integrated graphics simply cannot match in 2026.

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the undisputed winner in absolute rendering performance and stability. it is a legendary engine for stationary high-fidelity gaming. The Radeon 760M is the winner for mobile users on ultra-thin laptops who priority efficiency and modern media support in a portable package. however, for any stationary build, the jump to the 30-series desktop card is the superior and definitive choice.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 272.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 760M.

InsightGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon 760M
Performance
Leading raw performance (+272.8%)
Lower raw frame rates (-272.8%)
Longevity
🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm)
RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (4nm)
Ecosystem
✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon 760M

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

AMD

Radeon 760M

The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon 760M's 5,449 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 272.8%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon 760M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 512 (Radeon 760M). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 5.323 TFLOPS (Radeon 760M). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2599 MHz. Ray tracing: 38 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 8 (Radeon 760M) with 152 Tensor cores.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon 760M
G3D Mark Score
20,312+273%
5,449
Architecture
Ampere
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
8 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
4864+850%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
16.2 TFLOPS+204%
5.323 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
2599 MHz+56%
ROPs
80+400%
16
TMUs
152+375%
32
L1 Cache
4.8 MB+3592%
0.13 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
38+375%
8

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 760M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon 760M
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2.0
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 760M has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon 760M) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon 760M
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+100%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
System
Bus Width
256-bit
System
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon 760M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon 760M
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 (12_2)
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 760M). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon 760M).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon 760M
Encoder
NVENC (Ampere)
VCN 4.0
Decoder
NVDEC (Ampere)
VCN 4.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon 760M's 15W — a 172.1% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon 760M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon 760M
TDP
200W
15W-93%
Recommended PSU
600W
350W-42%
Power Connector
8-pin
None
Length
242mm
Height
112mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
75-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
101.6
363.3+258%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon 760M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2020).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon 760M
MSRP
$399
Avg Price (30d)
$280
Codename
GA104
Phoenix
Release
December 1 2020
January 31 2024
Ranking
#73
#421