
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon Pro 5300M

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5300M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 5300M
Why is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon Pro 5300M?
The matchup between the powerful GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and the budget mobile Radeon Pro 5300M highlights the monumental divide between desktop muscle and entry-level efficiency. The RTX 3060 Ti delivers roughly 1000% more raw compute performance, moving from a chip designed for basic 1080p notebooks to a desktop icon that masters 1440p Ultra with cinematic graphics.
Technically, the RTX 3060 Ti wins on absolute architectural edge, featuring dedicated hardware for Ray Tracing and mature DLSS support. The Radeon Pro 5300M remains a robust engine for high-performance 1080p tasks on mobile devices, but it lacks the core count and bandwidth needed for uncompromised 1440p immersion in 2026. Moving from any budget device with legacy RDNA graphics to a 30-series discrete tower is a transformative upgrade for most enthusiasts.
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the undisputed winner in absolute rendering performance and future-proof immersion. it is a world-class engine for high-fidelity 1440p digital environments. The Radeon Pro 5300M is the winner for mobile users who priority uncompromised efficiency and portability for entry-level tasks. however, for any Stationary rig seeking the ultimate immersion, the discrete 3060 Ti is the superior and definitive choice.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 247% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 5300M.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+247%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-247%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon Pro 5300M

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon Pro 5300M
The Radeon Pro 5300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,853 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon Pro 5300M's 5,853 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 247%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro 5300M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro 5300M). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5300M). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1250 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+247% | 5,853 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+280% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+406% | 3.2 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+33% | 1250 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+150% | 32 |
| TMUs | 152+90% | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 5300M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5300M has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 5300M) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5300M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5300M). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5300M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon Pro 5300M's 85W — a 80.7% difference. The Radeon Pro 5300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 5300M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 85W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+47% | 68.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $280 | — |
| Codename | GA104 | Navi 14 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | November 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #73 | #403 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














