GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
VS
Radeon RX 6950 XT

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon RX 6950 XT

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020Core: 1410 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 6950 XT

2022Core: 1925 MHzBoost: 2324 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
100%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
96%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
95%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
95%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
95%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
94%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
93%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
93%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
92%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
91%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
90%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
90%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
89%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
88%
#15
Radeon RX 6500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $150
88%
#16
GeForce RTX 3070
MSRP: $499|Avg: $200
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6950 XT

#56
Arc A770
MSRP: $349|Avg: $280
144%
#57
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
MSRP: $289|Avg: $423
144%
#58
Arc A380
MSRP: $149|Avg: $119
141%
#59
Radeon RX 9070
MSRP: $549|Avg: $550
140%
#60
Radeon RX 7900 XT
MSRP: $899|Avg: $630
139%
#61
GeForce RTX 4080
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $800
124%
#62
Arc A310
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
122%
#63
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
MSRP: $799|Avg: $800
120%
#64
Radeon RX 9070 XT
MSRP: $599|Avg: $700
116%
#65
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
MSRP: $749|Avg: $850
116%
#66
Radeon RX 6900 XT
MSRP: $999|Avg: $385
116%
#67
GeForce GTX 1630
MSRP: $150|Avg: $90
112%
#68
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
MSRP: $999|Avg: $999
104%
#69
Radeon RX 6800 XT
MSRP: $649|Avg: $743
102%
#70
Radeon RX 7900 XTX
MSRP: $999|Avg: $930
102%
#71
Radeon RX 6950 XT
MSRP: $1099|Avg: $850
100%
#72
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $550
97%
#73
GeForce RTX 3080 12GB
MSRP: $1250|Avg: $500
92%
#74
GeForce RTX 5080
MSRP: $999|Avg: $1250
87%
#75
GeForce RTX 3090
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $900
77%
#76
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
73%
#77
GeForce RTX 4090
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1649
70%
#78
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1100
64%
#79
Iris Xe Graphics MAX
MSRP: $55|Avg: $40
44%
#80
GeForce RTX 5090
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $2700
44%
#81
Moore Threads MTT S80
MSRP: $260|Avg: $170
42%
#82
Intel UHD Graphics P750
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
37%
#83
Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G
MSRP: $299|Avg: $100
37%
#84
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
30%
#85
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
28%
#86
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
28%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon RX 6950 XT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 38.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (16 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti.

InsightGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon RX 6950 XT
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-38.2%)
Leading raw performance (+38.2%)
Longevity
🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm)
🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm)
Ecosystem
✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
🎮 High Capacity (16 GB)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $280 versus $850 for the Radeon RX 6950 XT, it costs 67% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 119.6% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon RX 6950 XT
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+119.6%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($280)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($850)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon RX 6950 XT

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

AMD

Radeon RX 6950 XT

The Radeon RX 6950 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1925 MHz to 2324 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 335W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,076 points. Launch price was $1,099.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon RX 6950 XT's 28,076 — the Radeon RX 6950 XT leads by 38.2%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 6950 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 5,120 (Radeon RX 6950 XT). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 23.8 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6950 XT). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2324 MHz. Ray tracing: 38 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 80 (Radeon RX 6950 XT) with 152 Tensor cores.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon RX 6950 XT
G3D Mark Score
20,312
28,076+38%
Architecture
Ampere
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
8 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
4864
5120+5%
Compute (TFLOPS)
16.2 TFLOPS
23.8 TFLOPS+47%
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
2324 MHz+40%
ROPs
80
128+60%
TMUs
152
320+111%
L1 Cache
4.8 MB+380%
1 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
4 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
38
80+111%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6950 XT is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6950 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon RX 6950 XT
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2.0
FSR 3 (Native)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)
FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6950 XT has 16 GB. The Radeon RX 6950 XT offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon RX 6950 XT) — a 28.6% advantage for the Radeon RX 6950 XT. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon RX 6950 XT
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
16 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
576 GB/s+29%
Bus Width
256-bit
256-bit
L2 Cache
4 MB
4 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6950 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon RX 6950 XT
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs RDNA 2 (Radeon RX 6950 XT). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs RDNA 2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 decode (Radeon RX 6950 XT).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon RX 6950 XT
Encoder
NVENC (Ampere)
RDNA 2
Decoder
NVDEC (Ampere)
RDNA 2
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 decode
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon RX 6950 XT's 335W — a 50.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 850W (Radeon RX 6950 XT). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 83°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon RX 6950 XT
TDP
200W-40%
335W
Recommended PSU
600W-29%
850W
Power Connector
8-pin
2x 8-pin
Length
242mm
267mm
Height
112mm
120mm
Slots
2-33%
3
Temp (Load)
75-10%
83°C
Perf/Watt
101.6+21%
83.8
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $280, while the Radeon RX 6950 XT launched at $1099 and now averages $850. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 67.1% less ($570 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 72.5 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 33.0 (Radeon RX 6950 XT) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 119.7% better value. The Radeon RX 6950 XT is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060 TiRadeon RX 6950 XT
MSRP
$399-64%
$1099
Avg Price (30d)
$280-67%
$850
Performance per Dollar
72.5+120%
33.0
Codename
GA104
Navi 21
Release
December 1 2020
May 10 2022
Ranking
#73
#25