
GeForce RTX 3060 vs Quadro K3100M

GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:

Quadro K3100M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K3100M
Why is GeForce RTX 3060 better than Quadro K3100M?
The matchup between the powerful GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and the legacy mobile professional Quadro K3100M highlights the monumental divide between current desktop power and older workstation mobility. The RTX 3060 Ti is roughly 3500% faster, representing the jump from a chip that struggles with basic 1080p tasks to a card that masters 1440p Ultra and specialized 3D rendering with ease.
Technically, the RTX 3060 Ti features 8GB of fast VRAM and specialized hardware for Ray Tracing and DLSS support. The Quadro K3100M is based on a legacy architecture with just 4GB of memory and lacks the core count or features to handle modern 3D software at playable frame rates. Moving from any legacy notebook to an RTX 3060 Ti powered desktop is a life-changing improvement, providing the speed and fluidity needed for high-end rendering and professional creative work in 2026.
There is no contest here; the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the absolute winner. it represents several generations of rendering progress and provides the stability and detail needed for a world-class PC experience. The Quadro K3100M is now strictly piece of hardware history. if you are looking to revitalize your digital environment with a performance boost that is truly night and day, the RTX 3060 Ti is the definitive choice for enthusiasts by a wide margin.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3060 is significantly newer (2021 vs 2013). The GeForce RTX 3060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K3100M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 644.4% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (12 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro K3100M.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro K3100M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+644.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-644.4%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere / 8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $289 versus $400 for the Quadro K3100M, it costs 28% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 930.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro K3100M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+930.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($289) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($400) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and Quadro K3100M

GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

Quadro K3100M
The Quadro K3100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,283 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the Quadro K3100M's 2,283 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 644.4%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Quadro K3100M uses Kepler, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 768 (Quadro K3100M). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 1.084 TFLOPS (Quadro K3100M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro K3100M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995+644% | 2,283 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Kepler |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+367% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS+1075% | 1.084 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 112+75% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB+5733% | 0.06 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+500% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro K3100M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro K3100M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K3100M has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro K3100M) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro K3100M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+200% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+500% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Quadro K3100M's 75W — a 77.6% difference. The Quadro K3100M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 350W (Quadro K3100M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro K3100M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 75W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0+229% | 30.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 costs 27.8% less ($111 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 58.8 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 5.7 (Quadro K3100M) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 931.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro K3100M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $289-28% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 58.8+932% | 5.7 |
| Codename | GA106 | GK104 |
| Release | January 12 2021 | July 23 2013 |
| Ranking | #114 | #653 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















