GeForce RTX 4060 vs Quadro K3100M
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:
Quadro K3100M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K3100M
Why is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Quadro K3100M?
The matchup between the enthusiast GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB and the legacy mobile professional Quadro K3100M reveals the monumental divide between modern power and previous-gen workstation efficiency. The RTX 4060 Ti 16GB delivers roughly 2000% more raw compute performance, moving from a chip designed for high-end professional laptops in 2013 to a desktop powerhouse that masters 1440p Ultra with high refresh rates.
Technically, the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB wins on absolute architectural scale, featuring a massive 16GB VRAM buffer—more than four times the capacity of the older pro card—along with next-gen specialized cores for Ray Tracing and DLSS 3 support. The Quadro K3100M is based on a legacy architecture and lacks the core count or features to handle modern high-fidelity textures with any stability. Moving from any workstation with legacy graphics to a 40-series card powered tower is a life-changing improvement for most users in 2026.
There is no contest here; the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the absolute winner. it provides a level of detail and speed that turns the most demanding games into fluid, immersive experiences. The Quadro K3100M is strictly for basic office use on legacy notebooks. If you are looking to revitalize your digital environment with a performance boost that is truly night and day, the 16GB 40-series card is the superior and definitive choice.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4060 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2013). The GeForce RTX 4060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K3100M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 756.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro K3100M.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro K3100M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+756.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-756.2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $299 versus $400 for the Quadro K3100M, it costs 25% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 1045.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro K3100M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1045.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($299) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($400) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Quadro K3100M
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Quadro K3100M
The Quadro K3100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,283 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Quadro K3100M's 2,283 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 756.2%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro K3100M uses Kepler, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 768 (Quadro K3100M). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1.084 TFLOPS (Quadro K3100M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro K3100M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+756% | 2,283 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Kepler |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+300% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+1294% | 1.084 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 96+50% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+4900% | 0.06 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+4700% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro K3100M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro K3100M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro K3100M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K3100M has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro K3100M) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro K3100M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+4700% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Quadro K3100M's 75W — a 42.1% difference. The Quadro K3100M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (Quadro K3100M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro K3100M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 75W-35% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+459% | 30.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 25.3% less ($101 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 5.7 (Quadro K3100M) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 1047.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro K3100M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $299-25% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+1047% | 5.7 |
| Codename | AD107 | GK104 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | July 23 2013 |
| Ranking | #84 | #653 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4060 and Quadro K3100M
