RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU vs Radeon RX 6750 XT
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 6750 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6750 XT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 6750 XT.
| Insight | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+6.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.9%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU and Radeon RX 6750 XT
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,119 points.
Radeon RX 6750 XT
The Radeon RX 6750 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 3 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2150 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,686 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU scores 22,119 versus the Radeon RX 6750 XT's 20,686 — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU leads by 6.9%. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 6750 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 6,144 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 2,560 (Radeon RX 6750 XT). Raw compute: 26.73 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 13.31 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6750 XT). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2600 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 40 (Radeon RX 6750 XT) with 192 Tensor cores.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,119+7% | 20,686 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144+140% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 26.73 TFLOPS+101% | 13.31 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 2600 MHz+56% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 192+20% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB+1100% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1500% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48+20% | 40 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU uses DLSS 3 (AI-based) which is hardware-accelerated on Tensor Cores, often providing superior image quality. The Radeon RX 6750 XT utilizes FSR 3 & AFMF, which is more open but driver-based. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles.The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6750 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 12 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 6750 XT) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432 GB/s | 432 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1500% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6750 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6750 XT). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only),VP9 (Radeon RX 6750 XT).
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th Gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only),VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU draws 110W versus the Radeon RX 6750 XT's 250W — a 77.8% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 150W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) vs 650W (Radeon RX 6750 XT). Power connectors: Mobile vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 110W-56% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 150W-77% | 650W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 201.1+143% | 82.7 |
Value Analysis
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $549 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $320 |
| Codename | AD104 | Navi 22 |
| Release | August 9 2023 | March 3 2022 |
| Ranking | #47 | #70 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU and Radeon RX 6750 XT
