RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
Popular choices:
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
Performance Per Dollar RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU.
| Insight | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile and RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 7424 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 58 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,167 points.
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,119 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile scores 22,167 and the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU reaches 22,119 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 7,424 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 6,144 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 24.72 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 26.73 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1665 MHz. Ray tracing: 58 RT cores (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 48 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) with 232 Tensor cores vs 192.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,167 | 22,119 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 7424+21% | 6144 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 24.72 TFLOPS | 26.73 TFLOPS+8% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 232+21% | 192 |
| L1 Cache | 7.3 MB+22% | 6 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 48 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 58+21% | 48 |
| Tensor Cores | 232+21% | 192 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support modern Frame Generation technology, allowing them to insert intermediate frames to smoothen motion and boost perceived FPS in supported games.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 12 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432 GB/s | 432 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 48 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs AV1,H.265,H.264 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU).
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | AV1,H.265,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile draws 110W versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 110W — a 0% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 150W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 150W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Power connectors: Mobile vs Mobile. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 110W | 110W |
| Recommended PSU | 150W | 150W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | 241mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 201.5 | 201.1 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile and RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
