RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile vs RTX A6000
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
Popular choices:
RTX A6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
Performance Per Dollar RTX A6000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A6000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (48 GB vs 12 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile.
| Insight | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (48 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX A6000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile and RTX A6000
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 7424 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 58 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,167 points.
RTX A6000
The RTX A6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,815 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile scores 22,167 and the RTX A6000 reaches 22,815 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A6000 uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 7,424 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 8,192 (RTX A6000). Raw compute: 24.72 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 27.77 TFLOPS (RTX A6000). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1695 MHz. Ray tracing: 58 RT cores (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 64 (RTX A6000) with 232 Tensor cores vs 256.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,167 | 22,815+3% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 7424 | 8192+10% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 24.72 TFLOPS | 27.77 TFLOPS+12% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 1695 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 80 | 96+20% |
| TMUs | 232 | 256+10% |
| L1 Cache | 7.3 MB | 8 MB+10% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 58 | 64+10% |
| Tensor Cores | 232 | 256+10% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A6000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The RTX A6000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A6000 has 48 GB. The RTX A6000 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 432 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 768 GB/s (RTX A6000) — a 77.8% advantage for the RTX A6000. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 6 MB (RTX A6000) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 48 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432 GB/s | 768 GB/s+78% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 12.1 (RTX A6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A6000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A6000).
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | 7th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile draws 110W versus the RTX A6000's 230W — a 70.6% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 150W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 500W (RTX A6000). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin EPS. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 110W-52% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 150W-70% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 8-pin EPS |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 201.5+103% | 99.2 |
Value Analysis
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $4649 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $3500 |
| Codename | AD104 | GA102 |
| Release | March 21 2023 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #64 | #53 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile and RTX A6000
