GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

2023

Why buy it

✅7.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 232), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
❌50% higher power demand at 165W vs 110W.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

2023

Why buy it

✅70.6% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (232 vs 136).
✅Draws 110W instead of 165W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 45.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 7.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.5% in PassMark G3D (22,713 vs 22,167), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 16 GB vs 12 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,713 points. Launch price was $499.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 7424 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 58 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,167 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB scores 22,713 and the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile reaches 22,167 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 7,424 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 24.72 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1665 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 58 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) with 136 Tensor cores vs 232.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
G3D Mark Score	22,713+2%	22,167
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	5 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	4352	7424+71%
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS	24.72 TFLOPS+12%
Boost Clock	2535 MHz+52%	1665 MHz
ROPs	48	80+67%
TMUs	136	232+71%
L1 Cache	4.3 MB	7.3 MB+70%
L2 Cache	32 MB	48 MB+50%
Ray Tracing Cores	34	58+71%
Tensor Cores	136	232+71%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both cards support Frame Generation in supported games, so this part of the feature set is broadly comparable.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB has 16 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile carries 12 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 432 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) — a 50% advantage for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB and 192-bit on the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
VRAM Capacity	16 GB+33%	12 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	288 GB/s	432 GB/s+50%
Bus Width	128-bit	192-bit+50%
L2 Cache	32 MB	48 MB+50%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+300%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
Encoder	NVENC 8th gen	8th Gen NVENC
Decoder	NVDEC 5th gen	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB draws 165W versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile's 110W — a 40% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) vs 150W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs Mobile. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2.2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
TDP	165W	110W-33%
Recommended PSU	550W	150W-73%
Power Connector	16-pin (12VHPWR)	Mobile
Length	240mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2.2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	65°C-19%	80°C
Perf/Watt	137.7	201.5+46%