Quadro RTX A6000 vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

NVIDIA

Quadro RTX A6000

2020Core: 1410 MHzBoost: 1800 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

2023Core: 1290 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
RTX family
·······

Quadro RTX A6000 vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro RTX A6000 vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro RTX A6000 vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro RTX A6000

2020

Why buy it

  • 28.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($4,649 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 44.8% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (336 vs 232).
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 12 GB).

Trade-offs

  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
  • 172.7% higher power demand at 300W vs 110W.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

2023

Why buy it

  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 110W instead of 300W, a 190W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX A6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (232 vs 336), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro RTX A6000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 28.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.8% in PassMark G3D (22,798 vs 22,167), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while Quadro RTX A6000 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 8nm, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2020. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro RTX A6000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and strong 1440p, Quadro RTX A6000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and strong 1440p headroom, RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro RTX A6000 vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro RTX A6000

The Quadro RTX A6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1800 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,798 points. Launch price was $4,649.

NVIDIA

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 7424 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 58 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,167 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro RTX A6000 scores 22,798 and the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile reaches 22,167 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX A6000 is built on Ampere while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 10,752 (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 7,424 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Raw compute: 38.71 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 24.72 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Boost clocks: 1800 MHz vs 1665 MHz. Ray tracing: 84 RT cores (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 58 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) with 336 Tensor cores vs 232.

FeatureQuadro RTX A6000RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
G3D Mark Score
22,798+3%
22,167
Architecture
Ampere
Ada Lovelace
Process Node
8 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
10752+45%
7424
Compute (TFLOPS)
38.71 TFLOPS+57%
24.72 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1800 MHz+8%
1665 MHz
ROPs
112+40%
80
TMUs
336+45%
232
L1 Cache
10.5 MB+44%
7.3 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
48 MB+700%
Ray Tracing Cores
84+45%
58
Tensor Cores
336+45%
232

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro RTX A6000 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the Quadro RTX A6000 is capped at Upscaling support.

FeatureQuadro RTX A6000RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
Not Supported
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro RTX A6000 has 48 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile carries 12 GB. Quadro RTX A6000 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 432 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) — a 77.8% advantage for the Quadro RTX A6000. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Quadro RTX A6000 and 192-bit on the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro RTX A6000RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
VRAM Capacity
48 GB+300%
12 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
768 GB/s+78%
432 GB/s
Bus Width
384-bit+100%
192-bit
L2 Cache
6 MB
48 MB+700%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.

FeatureQuadro RTX A6000RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+300%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (7th Gen) (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Quadro RTX A6000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile).

FeatureQuadro RTX A6000RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
Encoder
NVENC (7th Gen)
8th Gen NVENC
Decoder
NVDEC (5th Gen)
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro RTX A6000 draws 300W versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile's 110W — a 92.7% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 150W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Power connectors: 8-pin EPS vs Mobile. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 80°C.

FeatureQuadro RTX A6000RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
TDP
300W
110W-63%
Recommended PSU
500W
150W-70%
Power Connector
8-pin EPS
Mobile
Length
267mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
85
80°C-6%
Perf/Watt
76.0
201.5+165%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile (2023 vs 2020).

FeatureQuadro RTX A6000RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
MSRP
$4649
Codename
GA102
AD104
Release
October 5 2020
March 21 2023
Ranking
#54
#64

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.