GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs GeForce MX350
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:
GeForce MX350
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX350
Why is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than GeForce MX350?
Comparing the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB to the GeForce MX350 demonstrates the gap between state-of-the-art desktop performance and modern entry-level mobile graphics. The GeForce MX350 is a 2020 mobile GPU designed for thin-and-light laptops, while the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is a 2023 desktop powerhouse from the Ada Lovelace generation.\n\nIn terms of performance, the desktop RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is roughly 10-12 times more powerful in modern benchmarks. It features dedicated hardware for Ray Tracing and AI-driven DLSS 3 upscaling, while the MX350 lacks these advanced features entirely. Furthermore, the desktop card benefits from much higher power limits and a massive 16GB VRAM buffer, whereas the MX350 is strictly limited by its mobile chassis and typically features just 2GB of memory. The RTX card enables a high-fidelity experience that the mobile entry-level chip cannot approach.\n\nUltimately, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the clear winner for anyone building or upgrading a performance-focused PC. The GeForce MX350 is an excellent solution for portables where battery life and size are the primary constraints, but for any level of serious gaming or professional creative work, the desktop 40-series card provides a level of fidelity and performance that defines the modern standard.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 701% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce MX350.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce MX350 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+701%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-701%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $380 (vs $200), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 321.6% better value per dollar than the GeForce MX350.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce MX350 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+321.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($380) | ✅More affordable ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and GeForce MX350
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
GeForce MX350
The GeForce MX350 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 747 MHz to 937 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,828 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the GeForce MX350's 2,828 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 701%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce MX350 uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 640 (GeForce MX350). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1.199 TFLOPS (GeForce MX350). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 937 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce MX350 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+701% | 2,828 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Pascal |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+580% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+1740% | 1.199 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+171% | 937 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 136+325% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+1770% | 0.23 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+6300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce MX350 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce MX350 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce MX350 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce MX350 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 56 GB/s (GeForce MX350) — a 414.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce MX350) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce MX350 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+414% | 56 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+6300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the GeForce MX350's 20W — a 155.6% difference. The GeForce MX350 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (GeForce MX350). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce MX350 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 20W-88% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6 | 141.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $380, while the GeForce MX350 launched at $250 and now averages $200. The GeForce MX350 costs 47.4% less ($180 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 59.6 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 14.1 (GeForce MX350) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 322.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce MX350 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $250-37% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $380 | $200-47% |
| Performance per Dollar | 59.6+323% | 14.1 |
| Codename | AD106 | GP107 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | February 10 2020 |
| Ranking | #59 | #597 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and GeForce MX350
