
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs GeForce RTX 2070

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 2070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 41% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 2070.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce RTX 2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+41%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-41%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 2070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $180 versus $380 for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti, it costs 53% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 49.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce RTX 2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+49.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($380) | ✅More affordable ($180) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and GeForce RTX 2070

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

GeForce RTX 2070
The GeForce RTX 2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 17 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,068 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the GeForce RTX 2070's 16,068 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 41%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce RTX 2070 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 2070). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 7.465 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2070). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1620 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 36 (GeForce RTX 2070) with 136 Tensor cores vs 288.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce RTX 2070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+41% | 16,068 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+89% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+196% | 7.465 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+56% | 1620 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 136 | 144+6% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+87% | 2.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 36+6% |
| Tensor Cores | 136 | 288+112% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 2070 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti supports the newer DLSS 3.5 (including Frame Gen/Ray Reconstruction), whereas the GeForce RTX 2070 is capped at DLSS 2.0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce RTX 2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2070) — a 55.6% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2070. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2070) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce RTX 2070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 448 GB/s+56% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.1 (GeForce RTX 2070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce RTX 2070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs NVENC 6.0 (GeForce RTX 2070). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce RTX 2070).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce RTX 2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC 6.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | PureVideo HD VP9 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the GeForce RTX 2070's 175W — a 9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 2070). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce RTX 2070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-9% | 175W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 550W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+54% | 91.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $380, while the GeForce RTX 2070 launched at $599 and now averages $180. The GeForce RTX 2070 costs 52.6% less ($200 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 59.6 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 89.3 (GeForce RTX 2070) — the GeForce RTX 2070 offers 49.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | GeForce RTX 2070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-33% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $380 | $180-53% |
| Performance per Dollar | 59.6 | 89.3+50% |
| Codename | AD106 | TU106 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | October 17 2018 |
| Ranking | #59 | #129 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















