GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon HD 8850M
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 8850M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8850M
Why is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon HD 8850M?
The matchup between the Radeon HD 8850M and the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB showcases a decade of rapid mobile-to-desktop evolution. The Radeon HD 8850M was a mid-range mobile GPU in 2013, designed for gaming laptops of its era. The RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is a 2023 desktop powerhouse focusing on modern efficiency and professional-grade VRAM capacity.\n\nIn terms of raw power, the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is approximately 20 times faster and introduces features like hardware-accelerated Ray Tracing and AI Frame Generation that didn't exist when the HD 8850M was released. The older mobile card is no longer supported by modern drivers, making it incapable of running many current titles. The RTX 4060 Ti's massive 16GB buffer ensures it can handle high-resolution textures and complex creative work that the older mobile chip simply cannot.\n\nUltimately, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is a massive, transformative upgrade. The Radeon HD 8850M represents the respectable performance of nearly a decade ago, but for today's standards, it is completely outmatched by even modern entry-level desktop solutions. The transition to the 40-series provides a night-and-day difference in resolution, fidelity, and system speed.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is significantly newer (2023 vs 2013). The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 8850M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2228% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8850M.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon HD 8850M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2228%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2228%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon HD 8850M
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
Radeon HD 8850M
The Radeon HD 8850M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 575 MHz to 625 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 973 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon HD 8850M's 973 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 2228%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon HD 8850M uses GCN 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 640 (Radeon HD 8850M). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.8 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8850M). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 625 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon HD 8850M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+2228% | 973 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+580% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+2657% | 0.8 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+306% | 625 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 136+240% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+2587% | 0.16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+12700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon HD 8850M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon HD 8850M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon HD 8850M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8850M has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 8850M) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon HD 8850M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+12700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon HD 8850M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon HD 8850M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs UVD3 (Radeon HD 8850M). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX (Radeon HD 8850M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon HD 8850M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | UVD3 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | UVD 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon HD 8850M's 50W — a 104.8% difference. The Radeon HD 8850M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8850M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon HD 8850M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 50W-69% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+626% | 19.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon HD 8850M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $380 | — |
| Codename | AD106 | Venus |
| Release | May 18 2023 | April 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #59 | #894 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon HD 8850M
