GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon PRO W6800
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:
Radeon PRO W6800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W6800
Why is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon PRO W6800?
Comparing the enthusiast GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB to the industrial Radeon PRO W6800 reveals two peaks of performance for different industries. The Radeon PRO W6800 is a workstation powerhouse from the RDNA 2 era, featuring a massive 32GB memory buffer and raw compute muscle that can match or exceed the 4060 Ti in professional benchmarks. It is designed for massive datasets and mission-critical rendering.
Technically, the Radeon PRO W6800 wins on absolute memory scale and workstation reliability, making it the definitive choice for enterprise 3D design and scientific computing. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB, while having less memory, provides superior AI-driven features like DLSS 3 Frame Generation and better efficiency for interactive software. Both are world-class engines, but the PRO card offers the industrial-grade stability and scale needed for professional workstations in 2026.
The Radeon PRO W6800 is the undisputed winner for any user who needs uncompromised workstation-grade power and massive memory for professional projects. it represents a world-class industrial engine. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the winner for desktop enthusiasts who priority value and high-end feature support for a world-class 1440p gaming experience on a budget. for any professional project requiring massive data headroom, the industrial Radeon card is the clear and superior winner.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 11.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon PRO W6800 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+11.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-11.7%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (32 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $380 versus $2,249 for the Radeon PRO W6800, it costs 83% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 561.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+561.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($380) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,249) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon PRO W6800
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
Radeon PRO W6800
The Radeon PRO W6800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2075 MHz to 2320 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,270 points. Launch price was $2,249.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon PRO W6800's 20,270 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 11.7%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W6800 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 3,840 (Radeon PRO W6800). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 17.82 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6800). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2320 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 60 (Radeon PRO W6800) with 136 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+12% | 20,270 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+13% | 3840 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+24% | 17.82 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+9% | 2320 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 136 | 240+76% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+473% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 60+76% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W6800 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W6800 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6800 has 32 GB. The Radeon PRO W6800 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6800) — a 100% advantage for the Radeon PRO W6800. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4 MB (Radeon PRO W6800) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 32 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 576 GB/s+100% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6800). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6800). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon PRO W6800).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon PRO W6800's 250W — a 43.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 650W (Radeon PRO W6800). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-36% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+75% | 81.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $380, while the Radeon PRO W6800 launched at $2249 and now averages $2249. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 83.1% less ($1869 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 59.6 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 9.0 (Radeon PRO W6800) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 562.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-82% | $2249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $380-83% | $2249 |
| Performance per Dollar | 59.6+562% | 9.0 |
| Codename | AD106 | Navi 21 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | June 8 2021 |
| Ranking | #59 | #74 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon PRO W6800
