CPU
GPU
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:
Radeon R9 M485X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M485X
Why is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon R9 M485X?
Comparing the legacy mobile Radeon R9 M485X to the modern GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB reveals the incredible speed of technological advancement over a decade. The RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is roughly 2000% faster, representing the jump from a flagship mobile chip of 2016 to a powerhouse that can master modern 1440p Ultra gaming today. This is the difference between an aging laptop heater and a modern AI-enhanced enthusiast icon.
Technically, these two share no ground. The RTX 4060 Ti 16GB features a massive 16GB VRAM buffer and next-gen specialized cores for AI and Ray Tracing. The Radeon R9 M485X is limited by legacy architecture and a tiny 2GB or 4GB buffer that cannot even support modern DirectX 12 features at playable rates. Moving to an RTX 4060 Ti powered system is a life-changing improvement, turning stuttering legacy gameplay into silk-smooth, high-fidelity visuals for any software in 2026.
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the undisputed winner in this comparison, providing a level of speed and features that the older mobile chip simply cannot replicate. it is the definitive choice for anyone who wants a world-class experience in gaming, 3D design, or AI research. The Radeon R9 M485X is now strictly a piece of hardware history. if you are looking for a performance boost that will completely revitalize your digital life, the 16GB 40-series card is the superior and definitive winner.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is significantly newer (2023 vs 2016). The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 M485X lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 495.9% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 M485X.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+495.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-495.9%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $380 (vs $150), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 135.2% better value per dollar than the Radeon R9 M485X.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+135.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($380) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon R9 M485X
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
Radeon R9 M485X
The Radeon R9 M485X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,801 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon R9 M485X's 3,801 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 495.9%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon R9 M485X uses GCN 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M485X). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M485X).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+496% | 3,801 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+113% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+645% | 2.961 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 136+6% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+760% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+6300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon R9 M485X lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 M485X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M485X has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M485X) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+6300% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 (Radeon R9 M485X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M485X). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon R9 M485X).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon R9 M485X's 250W — a 43.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M485X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-36% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+832% | 15.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $380, while the Radeon R9 M485X launched at $450 and now averages $150. The Radeon R9 M485X costs 60.5% less ($230 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 59.6 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 25.3 (Radeon R9 M485X) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 135.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-11% | $450 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $380 | $150-61% |
| Performance per Dollar | 59.6+136% | 25.3 |
| Codename | AD106 | Amethyst |
| Release | May 18 2023 | May 15 2016 |
| Ranking | #59 | #519 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon R9 M485X
