GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Tesla C2050 / C2070
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:
Tesla C2050 / C2070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Performance Per Dollar Tesla C2050 / C2070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is significantly newer (2023 vs 2011). The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 560.8% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (8 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla C2050 / C2070.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+560.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-560.8%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (248mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Tesla C2050 / C2070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $380 for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti, it costs 92% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 91.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+91.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($380) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Tesla C2050 / C2070
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
Tesla C2050 / C2070
The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,428 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Tesla C2050 / C2070's 3,428 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 560.8%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Tesla C2050 / C2070 uses Fermi, both on 5 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 448 (Tesla C2050 / C2070). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2050 / C2070).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+561% | 3,428 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Fermi |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+871% | 448 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+2046% | 1.028 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 136+143% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+389% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+4167% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla C2050 / C2070 has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.75 MB (Tesla C2050 / C2070) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+4167% | 0.75 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 11_0 (Tesla C2050 / C2070). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+11% | 11_0 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Tesla C2050 / C2070's 238W — a 39.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (Tesla C2050 / C2070). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 248mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-33% | 238W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 248mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+883% | 14.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $380, while the Tesla C2050 / C2070 launched at $2499 and now averages $30. The Tesla C2050 / C2070 costs 92.1% less ($350 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 59.6 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 114.3 (Tesla C2050 / C2070) — the Tesla C2050 / C2070 offers 91.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Tesla C2050 / C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-84% | $2499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $380 | $30-92% |
| Performance per Dollar | 59.6 | 114.3+92% |
| Codename | AD106 | GF100 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | July 25 2011 |
| Ranking | #59 | #569 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Tesla C2050 / C2070
