
GeForce RTX 4060 vs GeForce GTX 650

GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060
Performance Per Dollar
Why is GeForce RTX 4060 better than GeForce GTX 650?
Comparing the enthusiast GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB to the ancient GeForce GTX 650 highlights more than a decade of astronomical GPU progress. The RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is more than 8000% faster, representing the jump from a budget core of 2012 to a powerhouse that masters 1440p Ultra with high refresh rates and cinematic graphics.
Technically, these two share no ground. The RTX 4060 Ti 16GB features a massive 16GB VRAM buffer and next-gen specialized cores for Ray Tracing and DLSS support. The GeForce GTX 650 is based on a legacy architecture and lacks the core count or features to handle modern software. Moving from any legacy device to a 40-series card powered desktop is a life-changing improvement, providing the speed and fluidity needed for high-end rendering and professional creative work in 2026.
There is no contest here; the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the absolute winner. it provides a level of detail and speed that turns the most demanding games into fluid, immersive experiences. The GeForce GTX 650 is now strictly piece of hardware history. If you are looking to revitalize your PC experience with a performance boost that is truly night and day, the 16GB 40-series card is the definitive and superior choice.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4060 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2012). The GeForce RTX 4060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 650 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1013.2% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 650.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce GTX 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1013.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1013.2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $25 versus $299 for the GeForce RTX 4060, it costs 92% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 7.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce GTX 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+7.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($299) | ✅More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and GeForce GTX 650

GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

GeForce GTX 650
The GeForce GTX 650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 6 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 1058 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,756 points. Launch price was $109.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the GeForce GTX 650's 1,756 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 1013.2%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce GTX 650 uses Kepler, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 384 (GeForce GTX 650). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.8125 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 650).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce GTX 650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+1013% | 1,756 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Kepler |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+700% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+1760% | 0.8125 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 96+200% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+9900% | 0.03 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+9500% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 650 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce GTX 650 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce GTX 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 650 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 80 GB/s (GeForce GTX 650) — a 240% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce GTX 650) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce GTX 650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s+240% | 80 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+9500% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 11_0 (GeForce GTX 650). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce GTX 650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate+9% | 11_0 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs NVENC 2nd Gen (GeForce GTX 650). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC 1st Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs H.264 (GeForce GTX 650).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce GTX 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | NVENC 2nd Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC 1st Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the GeForce GTX 650's 65W — a 55.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 650). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 145mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce GTX 650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 65W-43% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 300W-45% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 145mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+530% | 27.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP and currently averages $299, while the GeForce GTX 650 launched at $109 and now averages $25. The GeForce GTX 650 costs 91.6% less ($274 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 70.2 (GeForce GTX 650) — the GeForce GTX 650 offers 7.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce GTX 650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $109-64% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $299 | $25-92% |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4 | 70.2+7% |
| Codename | AD107 | GK107 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | September 6 2012 |
| Ranking | #84 | #719 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















