
RTX 4500 Ada Generation vs GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

RTX 4500 Ada Generation
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 4500 Ada Generation
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 7.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RTX 4500 Ada Generation offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RTX 4500 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-7.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+7.6%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (24 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $600 versus $2,000 for the RTX 4500 Ada Generation, it costs 70% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 258.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX 4500 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+258.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,000) | ✅More affordable ($600) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 4500 Ada Generation and GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

RTX 4500 Ada Generation
The RTX 4500 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2070 MHz to 2580 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,850 points.

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1980 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 7168 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,958 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX 4500 Ada Generation scores 27,850 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER's 29,958 — the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER leads by 7.6%. The RTX 4500 Ada Generation is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 7,680 (RTX 4500 Ada Generation) vs 7,168 (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER). Raw compute: 39.63 TFLOPS (RTX 4500 Ada Generation) vs 35.48 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER). Boost clocks: 2580 MHz vs 2475 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (RTX 4500 Ada Generation) vs 56 (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) with 240 Tensor cores vs 224.
| Feature | RTX 4500 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 27,850 | 29,958+8% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680+7% | 7168 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 39.63 TFLOPS+12% | 35.48 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2580 MHz+4% | 2475 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 80 |
| TMUs | 240+7% | 224 |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB+7% | 7 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 48 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60+7% | 56 |
| Tensor Cores | 240+7% | 224 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX 4500 Ada Generation lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | RTX 4500 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 4500 Ada Generation comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER has 12 GB. The RTX 4500 Ada Generation offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (RTX 4500 Ada Generation) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) — a 12.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | RTX 4500 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+100% | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 504 GB/s+13% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 48 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 4500 Ada Generation) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 4500 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 4500 Ada Generation) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX 4500 Ada Generation) vs AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER).
| Feature | RTX 4500 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th Gen | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 4500 Ada Generation draws 210W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER's 220W — a 4.7% difference. The RTX 4500 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX 4500 Ada Generation) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 267mm vs 245mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | RTX 4500 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 210W-5% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 267mm | 245mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 132.6 | 136.2+3% |
Value Analysis
The RTX 4500 Ada Generation launched at $2250 MSRP and currently averages $2000, while the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER launched at $599 and now averages $600. The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER costs 70% less ($1400 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 13.9 (RTX 4500 Ada Generation) vs 49.9 (GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER) — the GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER offers 259% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | RTX 4500 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2250 | $599-73% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2000 | $600-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.9 | 49.9+259% |
| Codename | AD103 | AD104 |
| Release | August 9 2023 | January 8 2024 |
| Ranking | #27 | #18 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















