RTX 4500 Ada Generation vs Radeon PRO W7900
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Radeon PRO W7900
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 4500 Ada Generation
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7900
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon PRO W7900 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (48 GB vs 24 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX 4500 Ada Generation.
| Insight | RTX 4500 Ada Generation | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (24 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (48 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The RTX 4500 Ada Generation offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $2,000 versus $3,500 for the Radeon PRO W7900, it costs 43% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 72.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX 4500 Ada Generation | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+72.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($2,000) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($3,500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 4500 Ada Generation and Radeon PRO W7900
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
The RTX 4500 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2070 MHz to 2580 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,850 points.
Radeon PRO W7900
The Radeon PRO W7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,211 points. Launch price was $3,999.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 4500 Ada Generation scores 27,850 and the Radeon PRO W7900 reaches 28,211 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 4500 Ada Generation is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W7900 uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 7,680 (RTX 4500 Ada Generation) vs 6,144 (Radeon PRO W7900). Raw compute: 39.63 TFLOPS (RTX 4500 Ada Generation) vs 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7900). Boost clocks: 2580 MHz vs 2495 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (RTX 4500 Ada Generation) vs 96 (Radeon PRO W7900) with 240 Tensor cores.
| Feature | RTX 4500 Ada Generation | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 27,850 | 28,211+1% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680+25% | 6144 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 39.63 TFLOPS | 61.32 TFLOPS+55% |
| Boost Clock | 2580 MHz+3% | 2495 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 192+140% |
| TMUs | 240 | 384+60% |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB+150% | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60 | 96+60% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX 4500 Ada Generation | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 4500 Ada Generation comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7900 has 48 GB. The Radeon PRO W7900 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (RTX 4500 Ada Generation) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900) — a 92.9% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7900. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (RTX 4500 Ada Generation) vs 6 MB (Radeon PRO W7900) — the RTX 4500 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 4500 Ada Generation | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB | 48 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 864 GB/s+93% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 4500 Ada Generation) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 4500 Ada Generation | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 4500 Ada Generation) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7900). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX 4500 Ada Generation) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900).
| Feature | RTX 4500 Ada Generation | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th Gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 4500 Ada Generation draws 210W versus the Radeon PRO W7900's 295W — a 33.7% difference. The RTX 4500 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX 4500 Ada Generation) vs 750W (Radeon PRO W7900). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX 4500 Ada Generation | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 210W-29% | 295W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-13% | 750W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 132.6+39% | 95.6 |
Value Analysis
The RTX 4500 Ada Generation launched at $2250 MSRP and currently averages $2000, while the Radeon PRO W7900 launched at $3999 and now averages $3500. The RTX 4500 Ada Generation costs 42.9% less ($1500 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 13.9 (RTX 4500 Ada Generation) vs 8.1 (Radeon PRO W7900) — the RTX 4500 Ada Generation offers 71.6% better value.
| Feature | RTX 4500 Ada Generation | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2250-44% | $3999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2000-43% | $3500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.9+72% | 8.1 |
| Codename | AD103 | Navi 31 |
| Release | August 9 2023 | April 13 2023 |
| Ranking | #27 | #26 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 4500 Ada Generation and Radeon PRO W7900
