
RTX 5880 Ada Generation vs Radeon RX 6900 XT

RTX 5880 Ada Generation
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6900 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 5880 Ada Generation
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6900 XT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 6900 XT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RTX 5880 Ada Generation offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RTX 5880 Ada Generation | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+6.5%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (48 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 6900 XT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $385 versus $6,000 for the RTX 5880 Ada Generation, it costs 94% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 1559.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX 5880 Ada Generation | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1559.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($6,000) | ✅More affordable ($385) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 5880 Ada Generation and Radeon RX 6900 XT

RTX 5880 Ada Generation
The RTX 5880 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 5 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 14080 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 110 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 25,096 points.

Radeon RX 6900 XT
The Radeon RX 6900 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,729 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX 5880 Ada Generation scores 25,096 versus the Radeon RX 6900 XT's 26,729 — the Radeon RX 6900 XT leads by 6.5%. The RTX 5880 Ada Generation is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 6900 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 14,080 (RTX 5880 Ada Generation) vs 5,120 (Radeon RX 6900 XT). Raw compute: 69.27 TFLOPS (RTX 5880 Ada Generation) vs 23.04 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6900 XT). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 2250 MHz. Ray tracing: 110 RT cores (RTX 5880 Ada Generation) vs 80 (Radeon RX 6900 XT) with 440 Tensor cores.
| Feature | RTX 5880 Ada Generation | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 25,096 | 26,729+7% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 14080+175% | 5120 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 69.27 TFLOPS+201% | 23.04 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+9% | 2250 MHz |
| ROPs | 176+38% | 128 |
| TMUs | 440+38% | 320 |
| L1 Cache | 13.8 MB+1280% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+1700% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 110+38% | 80 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6900 XT is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX 5880 Ada Generation lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | RTX 5880 Ada Generation | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 5880 Ada Generation comes with 48 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6900 XT has 16 GB. The RTX 5880 Ada Generation offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 768 GB/s (RTX 5880 Ada Generation) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon RX 6900 XT) — a 50% advantage for the RTX 5880 Ada Generation. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 72 MB (RTX 5880 Ada Generation) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 6900 XT) — the RTX 5880 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 5880 Ada Generation | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB+200% | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 768 GB/s+50% | 512 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+1700% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (RTX 5880 Ada Generation) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6900 XT). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 5880 Ada Generation | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (RTX 5880 Ada Generation) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6900 XT). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP8,VP9 (RTX 5880 Ada Generation) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 6900 XT).
| Feature | RTX 5880 Ada Generation | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP8,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 5880 Ada Generation draws 285W versus the Radeon RX 6900 XT's 300W — a 5.1% difference. The RTX 5880 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX 5880 Ada Generation) vs 850W (Radeon RX 6900 XT). Power connectors: 16-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2.5 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX 5880 Ada Generation | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W-5% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-24% | 850W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 120mm |
| Slots | 2-20% | 2.5 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.1 | 89.1+1% |
Value Analysis
The RTX 5880 Ada Generation launched at $6000 MSRP and currently averages $6000, while the Radeon RX 6900 XT launched at $999 and now averages $385. The Radeon RX 6900 XT costs 93.6% less ($5615 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.2 (RTX 5880 Ada Generation) vs 69.4 (Radeon RX 6900 XT) — the Radeon RX 6900 XT offers 1552.4% better value. The RTX 5880 Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2020).
| Feature | RTX 5880 Ada Generation | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6000 | $999-83% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $6000 | $385-94% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.2 | 69.4+1552% |
| Codename | AD102 | Navi 21 |
| Release | January 5 2024 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #40 | #35 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















