RTX 5880 Ada Generation vs GeForce GTX 1650
RTX 5880 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 5880 Ada Generation
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 5880 Ada Generation is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 218.9% higher G3D Mark score and 1100% more VRAM (48 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.
| Insight | RTX 5880 Ada Generation | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+218.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-218.9%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (48 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $6,000 for the RTX 5880 Ada Generation, it costs 99% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 2408.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX 5880 Ada Generation | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2408.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($6,000) | ✅More affordable ($75) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 5880 Ada Generation and GeForce GTX 1650
RTX 5880 Ada Generation
The RTX 5880 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 5 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 14080 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 110 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 25,096 points.
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX 5880 Ada Generation scores 25,096 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the RTX 5880 Ada Generation leads by 218.9%. The RTX 5880 Ada Generation is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 14,080 (RTX 5880 Ada Generation) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 69.27 TFLOPS (RTX 5880 Ada Generation) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | RTX 5880 Ada Generation | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 25,096+219% | 7,869 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 14080+1471% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 69.27 TFLOPS+2221% | 2.984 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+48% | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 176+450% | 32 |
| TMUs | 440+686% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 13.8 MB+1468% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+7100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX 5880 Ada Generation | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 5880 Ada Generation comes with 48 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The RTX 5880 Ada Generation offers 1100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 768 GB/s (RTX 5880 Ada Generation) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 500% advantage for the RTX 5880 Ada Generation. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 72 MB (RTX 5880 Ada Generation) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the RTX 5880 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 5880 Ada Generation | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB+1100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 768 GB/s+500% | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+7100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (RTX 5880 Ada Generation) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | RTX 5880 Ada Generation | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (RTX 5880 Ada Generation) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP8,VP9 (RTX 5880 Ada Generation) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).
| Feature | RTX 5880 Ada Generation | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP8,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 5880 Ada Generation draws 285W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 116.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX 5880 Ada Generation) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: 16-pin vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | RTX 5880 Ada Generation | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 75W-74% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 300W-54% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | None |
| Length | 267mm | 229mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 88.1 | 104.9+19% |
Value Analysis
The RTX 5880 Ada Generation launched at $6000 MSRP and currently averages $6000, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 98.8% less ($5925 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.2 (RTX 5880 Ada Generation) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 2397.6% better value. The RTX 5880 Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2019).
| Feature | RTX 5880 Ada Generation | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6000 | $149-98% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $6000 | $75-99% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.2 | 104.9+2398% |
| Codename | AD102 | TU117 |
| Release | January 5 2024 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #40 | #323 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 5880 Ada Generation and GeForce GTX 1650
