RTX A3000 Mobile vs GeForce GTX TITAN X
RTX A3000 Mobile
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX TITAN X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A3000 Mobile
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX A3000 Mobile is significantly newer (2021 vs 2015). The RTX A3000 Mobile likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN X lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A3000 Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX TITAN X offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RTX A3000 Mobile | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX A3000 Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A3000 Mobile and GeForce GTX TITAN X
RTX A3000 Mobile
The RTX A3000 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 1230 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,720 points.
GeForce GTX TITAN X
The GeForce GTX TITAN X is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,621 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A3000 Mobile scores 12,720 and the GeForce GTX TITAN X reaches 12,621 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A3000 Mobile is built on Ampere while the GeForce GTX TITAN X uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (RTX A3000 Mobile) vs 3,072 (GeForce GTX TITAN X). Raw compute: 10.08 TFLOPS (RTX A3000 Mobile) vs 6.691 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN X). Boost clocks: 1230 MHz vs 1075 MHz.
| Feature | RTX A3000 Mobile | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,720 | 12,621 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+33% | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.08 TFLOPS+51% | 6.691 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1230 MHz+14% | 1075 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 128 | 192+50% |
| L1 Cache | 4 MB+264% | 1.1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A3000 Mobile | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX A3000 Mobile comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX TITAN X has 12 GB. The GeForce GTX TITAN X offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (RTX A3000 Mobile) vs 3 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN X) — the RTX A3000 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX A3000 Mobile | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A3000 Mobile) vs 12 (FL 12_1) (GeForce GTX TITAN X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX A3000 Mobile | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (FL 12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A3000 Mobile) vs NVENC 2nd gen (GeForce GTX TITAN X). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 2nd gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A3000 Mobile) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX TITAN X).
| Feature | RTX A3000 Mobile | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | NVENC 2nd gen |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 2nd gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A3000 Mobile draws 70W versus the GeForce GTX TITAN X's 250W — a 112.5% difference. The RTX A3000 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX A3000 Mobile) vs 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 83°C.
| Feature | RTX A3000 Mobile | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-72% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-4% | 83°C |
| Perf/Watt | 181.7+260% | 50.5 |
Value Analysis
The RTX A3000 Mobile is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2015).
| Feature | RTX A3000 Mobile | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $120 |
| Codename | GA104 | GM200 |
| Release | April 12 2021 | March 17 2015 |
| Ranking | #205 | #209 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX A3000 Mobile and GeForce GTX TITAN X
