RTX A3000 Mobile
VS
Radeon RX 5700M

RTX A3000 Mobile vs Radeon RX 5700M

NVIDIA

RTX A3000 Mobile

2021Core: 600 MHzBoost: 1230 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 5700M

2020Core: 1465 MHzBoost: 1720 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RTX A3000 Mobile

#12
RTX A3000 Mobile
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#16
Radeon RX 7600S
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
182%
#19
Radeon RX 5600
MSRP: $229|Avg: $150
161%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 5700M

#16
Radeon RX 7600S
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
100%
#17
Radeon RX 5700M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#19
Radeon RX 5600
MSRP: $229|Avg: $150
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RTX A3000 Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 5700M.

InsightRTX A3000 MobileRadeon RX 5700M
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.4%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%)
Longevity
🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm)
🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) / 7nm)
Ecosystem
✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling
✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support
VRAM
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX A3000 Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RTX A3000 Mobile and Radeon RX 5700M

NVIDIA

RTX A3000 Mobile

The RTX A3000 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 1230 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,720 points.

AMD

Radeon RX 5700M

The Radeon RX 5700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,669 points.

Graphics Performance

The RTX A3000 Mobile scores 12,720 and the Radeon RX 5700M reaches 12,669 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A3000 Mobile is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 5700M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (RTX A3000 Mobile) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700M). Raw compute: 10.08 TFLOPS (RTX A3000 Mobile) vs 7.926 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700M). Boost clocks: 1230 MHz vs 1720 MHz.

FeatureRTX A3000 MobileRadeon RX 5700M
G3D Mark Score
12,720
12,669
Architecture
Ampere
RDNA 1.0
Process Node
8 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
4096+78%
2304
Compute (TFLOPS)
10.08 TFLOPS+27%
7.926 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1230 MHz
1720 MHz+40%
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
128
144+13%
L2 Cache
4 MB
8 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRTX A3000 MobileRadeon RX 5700M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (RTX A3000 Mobile) vs 8 MB (Radeon RX 5700M) — the Radeon RX 5700M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRTX A3000 MobileRadeon RX 5700M
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
4 MB
8 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A3000 Mobile) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5700M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRTX A3000 MobileRadeon RX 5700M
DirectX
12.2
12.1
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A3000 Mobile) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700M). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A3000 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700M).

FeatureRTX A3000 MobileRadeon RX 5700M
Encoder
7th Gen NVENC
VCN 2.0
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
VCN 2.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RTX A3000 Mobile draws 70W versus the Radeon RX 5700M's 180W — a 88% difference. The RTX A3000 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX A3000 Mobile) vs 500W (Radeon RX 5700M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

FeatureRTX A3000 MobileRadeon RX 5700M
TDP
70W-61%
180W
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
80°C-6%
85°C
Perf/Watt
181.7+158%
70.4