RTX A4500 Mobile
VS
Radeon RX 6650 XT

RTX A4500 Mobile vs Radeon RX 6650 XT

NVIDIA

RTX A4500 Mobile

2022Core: 930 MHzBoost: 1500 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 6650 XT

2022Core: 2055 MHzBoost: 2635 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RTX A4500 Mobile

#42
Radeon RX 6600S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
235%
#43
Radeon RX 8060S
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
231%
#47
Radeon RX 6700S
MSRP: $479|Avg: $300
227%
#52
Radeon 8060S
MSRP: $800|Avg: $800
163%
#53
Radeon RX 6850M XT
MSRP: $800|Avg: $800
157%
#54
Radeon RX 6800S
MSRP: $800|Avg: $800
143%
#56
RTX A4500 Mobile
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#61
GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)
MSRP: $800|Avg: $350
112%
#62
GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $350
108%
#63
RadeonT RX 6850M XT
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $600
101%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6650 XT

#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
112%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
111%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
110%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
109%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
108%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
108%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
107%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
106%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
105%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
104%
#15
Radeon RX 6500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $150
104%
#16
GeForce RTX 3070
MSRP: $499|Avg: $200
103%
#17
Radeon RX 6700
MSRP: $379|Avg: $300
103%
#18
Radeon RX 6600 XT
MSRP: $379|Avg: $170
101%
#19
Radeon RX590 GME
MSRP: $173|Avg: $115
101%
#20
Radeon RX 6650 XT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $230
100%
#21
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
98%
#22
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
MSRP: $169|Avg: $179
98%
#23
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
MSRP: $249|Avg: $209
98%
#24
Radeon RX 6600 LE
MSRP: $329|Avg: $160
97%
#25
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
97%
#26
Radeon RX 7700 XT
MSRP: $449|Avg: $380
97%
#27
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $380
97%
#28
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB
MSRP: $269|Avg: $318
96%
#29
Radeon RX 6700 XT
MSRP: $479|Avg: $230
96%
#30
GeForce RTX 3060
MSRP: $329|Avg: $289
96%
#31
Radeon RX 7400
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
95%
#32
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
95%
#33
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
93%
#34
Radeon RX 5300
MSRP: $129|Avg: $50
92%
#35
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
MSRP: $150|Avg: $77
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon RX 6650 XT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RTX A4500 Mobile offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRTX A4500 MobileRadeon RX 6650 XT
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-3.2%)
Leading raw performance (+3.2%)
Longevity
🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere / 8nm)
🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm)
Ecosystem
✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
🎮 High Capacity (16 GB)
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 6650 XT remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RTX A4500 Mobile and Radeon RX 6650 XT

NVIDIA

RTX A4500 Mobile

The RTX A4500 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,613 points.

AMD

Radeon RX 6650 XT

The Radeon RX 6650 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2055 MHz to 2635 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 176W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,148 points. Launch price was $399.

Graphics Performance

The RTX A4500 Mobile scores 16,613 and the Radeon RX 6650 XT reaches 17,148 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A4500 Mobile is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 6650 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (RTX A4500 Mobile) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 6650 XT). Raw compute: 17.66 TFLOPS (RTX A4500 Mobile) vs 10.79 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6650 XT). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 2635 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (RTX A4500 Mobile) vs 32 (Radeon RX 6650 XT) with 184 Tensor cores.

FeatureRTX A4500 MobileRadeon RX 6650 XT
G3D Mark Score
16,613
17,148+3%
Architecture
Ampere
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
8 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
5888+188%
2048
Compute (TFLOPS)
17.66 TFLOPS+64%
10.79 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
2635 MHz+76%
ROPs
96+50%
64
TMUs
184+44%
128
L1 Cache
5.8 MB+1060%
0.5 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
46+44%
32

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6650 XT is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A4500 Mobile lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

FeatureRTX A4500 MobileRadeon RX 6650 XT
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 3 (Native)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RTX A4500 Mobile comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6650 XT has 8 GB. The RTX A4500 Mobile offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (RTX A4500 Mobile) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 6650 XT) — the RTX A4500 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRTX A4500 MobileRadeon RX 6650 XT
VRAM Capacity
16 GB+100%
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A4500 Mobile) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6650 XT). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.

FeatureRTX A4500 MobileRadeon RX 6650 XT
DirectX
12.2+2%
12 Ultimate
Vulkan
1.2
1.4+17%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
1
4+300%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A4500 Mobile) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6650 XT). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (RTX A4500 Mobile) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only),VP9 (Radeon RX 6650 XT).

FeatureRTX A4500 MobileRadeon RX 6650 XT
Encoder
7th Gen NVENC
VCN 3.0
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
VCN 3.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only),VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RTX A4500 Mobile draws 140W versus the Radeon RX 6650 XT's 176W — a 22.8% difference. The RTX A4500 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX A4500 Mobile) vs 500W (Radeon RX 6650 XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

FeatureRTX A4500 MobileRadeon RX 6650 XT
TDP
140W-20%
176W
Recommended PSU
650W
500W-23%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
8-pin
Length
0mm
241mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
80°C
Perf/Watt
118.7+22%
97.4