
RTX A4500 Mobile vs Radeon PRO W7600

RTX A4500 Mobile
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W7600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A4500 Mobile
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A4500 Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (16 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon PRO W7600.
| Insight | RTX A4500 Mobile | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere / 8nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 3.0 / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX A4500 Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A4500 Mobile and Radeon PRO W7600

RTX A4500 Mobile
The RTX A4500 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,613 points.

Radeon PRO W7600
The Radeon PRO W7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2440 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,443 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A4500 Mobile scores 16,613 and the Radeon PRO W7600 reaches 16,443 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A4500 Mobile is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO W7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (RTX A4500 Mobile) vs 2,048 (Radeon PRO W7600). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 2440 MHz.
| Feature | RTX A4500 Mobile | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,613+1% | 16,443 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+188% | 2048 |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | 2440 MHz+63% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+44% | 128 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A4500 Mobile | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX A4500 Mobile comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7600 has 8 GB. The RTX A4500 Mobile offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | RTX A4500 Mobile | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX A4500 Mobile) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7600). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX A4500 Mobile | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A4500 Mobile) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7600). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (RTX A4500 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7600).
| Feature | RTX A4500 Mobile | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A4500 Mobile draws 140W versus the Radeon PRO W7600's 130W — a 7.4% difference. The Radeon PRO W7600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX A4500 Mobile) vs 650W (Radeon PRO W7600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 240mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | RTX A4500 Mobile | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 140W | 130W-7% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 240mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 118.7 | 126.5+7% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | RTX A4500 Mobile | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $599 |
| Codename | GA104 | Navi 33 |
| Release | March 22 2022 | August 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #119 | #123 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














