GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs Radeon PRO W7600
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Radeon PRO W7600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 92% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (12 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon PRO W7600.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+92%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-92%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 3.0 / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (285mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $590 versus $599 for the Radeon PRO W7600, it costs 2% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 95% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+95%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($590) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($599) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Radeon PRO W7600
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Radeon PRO W7600
The Radeon PRO W7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2440 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,443 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Radeon PRO W7600's 16,443 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 92%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 4 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 2,048 (Radeon PRO W7600). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 2440 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+92% | 16,443 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680+275% | 2048 |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz+7% | 2440 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 240+88% | 128 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7600 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7600 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7600 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7600) — a 125% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s+125% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7600). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7600). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7600).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Radeon PRO W7600's 130W — a 74.7% difference. The Radeon PRO W7600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 650W (Radeon PRO W7600). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 285mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 130W-54% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 650W-7% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 285mm | 240mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8 | 126.5+14% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP and currently averages $590, while the Radeon PRO W7600 launched at $599 and now averages $599. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti costs 1.5% less ($9 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 53.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 27.5 (Radeon PRO W7600) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 94.5% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $599-25% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $590-2% | $599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.5+95% | 27.5 |
| Codename | AD104 | Navi 33 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | August 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #11 | #123 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Radeon PRO W7600
