RTX A4500 vs Radeon PRO W6800
RTX A4500
Popular choices:
Radeon PRO W6800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX A4500
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W6800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A4500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon PRO W6800 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RTX A4500 | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.1%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (2 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (32 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The RTX A4500 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $800 versus $2,249 for the Radeon PRO W6800, it costs 64% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 192.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX A4500 | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+192.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($800) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,249) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX A4500 and Radeon PRO W6800
RTX A4500
The RTX A4500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1050 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 7168 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,094 points.
Radeon PRO W6800
The Radeon PRO W6800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2075 MHz to 2320 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,270 points. Launch price was $2,249.
Graphics Performance
The RTX A4500 scores 21,094 and the Radeon PRO W6800 reaches 20,270 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX A4500 is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO W6800 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 7,168 (RTX A4500) vs 3,840 (Radeon PRO W6800). Raw compute: 23.65 TFLOPS (RTX A4500) vs 17.82 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6800). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 2320 MHz. Ray tracing: 56 RT cores (RTX A4500) vs 60 (Radeon PRO W6800) with 224 Tensor cores.
| Feature | RTX A4500 | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 21,094+4% | 20,270 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 7168+87% | 3840 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 23.65 TFLOPS+33% | 17.82 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz | 2320 MHz+41% |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 224 | 240+7% |
| L1 Cache | 7 MB+833% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 56 | 60+7% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX A4500 | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX A4500 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6800 has 32 GB. The Radeon PRO W6800 offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (RTX A4500) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6800) — a 28.6% advantage for the Radeon PRO W6800. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (RTX A4500) vs 4 MB (Radeon PRO W6800) — the RTX A4500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX A4500 | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 32 GB+1500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 576 GB/s+29% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (RTX A4500) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6800). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | RTX A4500 | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A4500) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6800). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4500) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon PRO W6800).
| Feature | RTX A4500 | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC (2x) | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX A4500 draws 200W versus the Radeon PRO W6800's 250W — a 22.2% difference. The RTX A4500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (RTX A4500) vs 650W (Radeon PRO W6800). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX A4500 | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-20% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-31% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 105.5+30% | 81.1 |
Value Analysis
The RTX A4500 launched at $1699 MSRP and currently averages $800, while the Radeon PRO W6800 launched at $2249 and now averages $2249. The RTX A4500 costs 64.4% less ($1449 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 26.4 (RTX A4500) vs 9.0 (Radeon PRO W6800) — the RTX A4500 offers 193.3% better value.
| Feature | RTX A4500 | Radeon PRO W6800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1699-24% | $2249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $800-64% | $2249 |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.4+193% | 9.0 |
| Codename | GA102 | Navi 21 |
| Release | November 23 2021 | June 8 2021 |
| Ranking | #68 | #74 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX A4500 and Radeon PRO W6800
