G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

RTX A4500 vs TITAN RTX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

RTX A4500 vs TITAN RTX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

RTX A4500

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $800 less on MSRP ($1,699 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 54.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.4 vs 8.0 G3D/$ ($1,699 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 200W instead of 280W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than TITAN RTX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (224 vs 576), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.

TITAN RTX

2018

Why buy it

✅57.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅157.1% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (576 vs 224).
✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌
47.1% HIGHER MSRP
$2,499 MSRPvs$1,699 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.0 vs 12.4 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
❌40% higher power demand at 280W vs 200W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

TITAN RTX is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 57.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward RTX A4500 instead at 21,094 vs 20,095, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTX A4500 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 8nm process instead of 12nm and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2018. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RTX A4500 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $800 cheaper on MSRP at $1,699 vs $2,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 54.4% (12.4 vs 8.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. TITAN RTX still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

RTX A4500 vs TITAN RTX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

RTX A4500

The RTX A4500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1050 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 7168 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,094 points.

TITAN RTX

The TITAN RTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 18 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 280W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,095 points. Launch price was $2,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RTX A4500 scores 21,094 versus the TITAN RTX's 20,095 — the RTX A4500 leads by 5%. The RTX A4500 is built on Ampere while the TITAN RTX uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 7,168 (RTX A4500) vs 4,608 (TITAN RTX). Raw compute: 23.65 TFLOPS (RTX A4500) vs 16.31 TFLOPS (TITAN RTX). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 1770 MHz. Ray tracing: 56 RT cores (RTX A4500) vs 72 (TITAN RTX) with 224 Tensor cores vs 576.

Feature	RTX A4500	TITAN RTX
G3D Mark Score	21,094+5%	20,095
Architecture	Ampere	Turing
Process Node	8 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	7168+56%	4608
Compute (TFLOPS)	23.65 TFLOPS+45%	16.31 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1650 MHz	1770 MHz+7%
ROPs	96	96
TMUs	224	288+29%
L1 Cache	7 MB+56%	4.5 MB
L2 Cache	6 MB	6 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	56	72+29%
Tensor Cores	224	576+157%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RTX A4500	TITAN RTX
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RTX A4500 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the TITAN RTX carries 24 GB. TITAN RTX gives you 1100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (RTX A4500) vs 672 GB/s (TITAN RTX) — a 50% advantage for the TITAN RTX. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the RTX A4500 and 384-bit on the TITAN RTX.

Feature	RTX A4500	TITAN RTX
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	24 GB+1100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	448 GB/s	672 GB/s+50%
Bus Width	192-bit	384-bit+100%
L2 Cache	6 MB	6 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (RTX A4500) vs 12 Ultimate (TITAN RTX). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	RTX A4500	TITAN RTX
DirectX	12.1	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A4500) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (TITAN RTX). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (4th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4500) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (TITAN RTX).

Feature	RTX A4500	TITAN RTX
Encoder	7th Gen NVENC (2x)	NVENC (7th Gen)
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	NVDEC (4th Gen)
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RTX A4500 draws 200W versus the TITAN RTX's 280W — a 33.3% difference. The RTX A4500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (RTX A4500) vs 650W (TITAN RTX). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.

Feature	RTX A4500	TITAN RTX
TDP	200W-29%	280W
Recommended PSU	450W-31%	650W
Power Connector	8-pin	2x 8-pin
Length	267mm	267mm
Height	111mm	116mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	80
Perf/Watt	105.5+47%	71.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the RTX A4500 came in at $1699, while the TITAN RTX launched at $2499. On MSRP, RTX A4500 was 32% cheaper ($800 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.4 (RTX A4500) vs 8.0 (TITAN RTX) — the RTX A4500 offers 55% better value. The newer card here is RTX A4500 (2021 vs 2018).

Feature	RTX A4500	TITAN RTX
MSRP	$1699-32%	$2499
Performance per Dollar	12.4+55%	8.0
Codename	GA102	TU102
Release	November 23 2021	December 18 2018
Ranking	#68	#91

Search RTX A4500 on Amazon

Search TITAN RTX on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.