
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

RTX A4500
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile vs RTX A4500 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile vs RTX A4500 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile vs RTX A4500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅37.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 200W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
RTX A4500
2021Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,699 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌81.8% higher power demand at 200W vs 110W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile vs RTX A4500 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 7424 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 58 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,167 points.

RTX A4500
The RTX A4500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1050 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 7168 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,094 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile scores 22,167 versus the RTX A4500's 21,094 — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile leads by 5.1%. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A4500 uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 7,424 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 7,168 (RTX A4500). Raw compute: 24.72 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 23.65 TFLOPS (RTX A4500). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1650 MHz. Ray tracing: 58 RT cores (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 56 (RTX A4500) with 232 Tensor cores vs 224.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,167+5% | 21,094 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 7424+4% | 7168 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 24.72 TFLOPS+5% | 23.65 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 1650 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 96+20% |
| TMUs | 232+4% | 224 |
| L1 Cache | 7.3 MB+4% | 7 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 58+4% | 56 |
| Tensor Cores | 232+4% | 224 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The RTX A4500 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX A4500 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile has 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4500 carries 2 GB. RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile gives you 500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 432 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4500) — a 3.7% advantage for the RTX A4500. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile and 192-bit on the RTX A4500. L2 Cache: 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 6 MB (RTX A4500) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+500% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432 GB/s | 448 GB/s+4% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 12.1 (RTX A4500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A4500). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4500).
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | 7th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile draws 110W versus the RTX A4500's 200W — a 58.1% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 150W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 450W (RTX A4500). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 110W-45% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 150W-67% | 450W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 201.5+91% | 105.5 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $1699 |
| Codename | AD104 | GA102 |
| Release | March 21 2023 | November 23 2021 |
| Ranking | #64 | #68 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














