RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs RTX A4500
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Popular choices:
RTX A4500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Performance Per Dollar RTX A4500
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A4500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation.
| Insight | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (2 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (2 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The RTX A4500 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $800 versus $1,450 for the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, it costs 45% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 85% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+85%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,450) | ✅More affordable ($800) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and RTX A4500
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 720 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,669 points.
RTX A4500
The RTX A4500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1050 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 7168 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,094 points.
Graphics Performance
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation scores 20,669 and the RTX A4500 reaches 21,094 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A4500 uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 6,144 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 7,168 (RTX A4500). Raw compute: 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 23.65 TFLOPS (RTX A4500). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 1650 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 56 (RTX A4500) with 192 Tensor cores vs 224.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,669 | 21,094+2% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144 | 7168+17% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 19.17 TFLOPS | 23.65 TFLOPS+23% |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 1650 MHz+6% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 192 | 224+17% |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB | 7 MB+17% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | 56+17% |
| Tensor Cores | 192 | 224+17% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A4500 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The RTX A4500 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 280 GB/s (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4500) — a 60% advantage for the RTX A4500. Bus width: 160-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 6 MB (RTX A4500) — the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 ECC | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 280 GB/s | 448 GB/s+60% |
| Bus Width | 160-bit | 192-bit+20% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 12.1 (RTX A4500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A4500). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4500).
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | 7th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation draws 70W versus the RTX A4500's 200W — a 96.3% difference. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 450W (RTX A4500). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-65% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 450W-40% |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 295.3+180% | 105.5 |
Value Analysis
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation launched at $1999 MSRP and currently averages $1450, while the RTX A4500 launched at $1699 and now averages $800. The RTX A4500 costs 44.8% less ($650 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.3 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 26.4 (RTX A4500) — the RTX A4500 offers 84.6% better value. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999 | $1699-15% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1450 | $800-45% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.3 | 26.4+85% |
| Codename | AD104 | GA102 |
| Release | March 21 2023 | November 23 2021 |
| Ranking | #71 | #68 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and RTX A4500
