Radeon PRO W6800 vs RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

CPU

GPU

Radeon PRO W6800

2021Core: 2075 MHzBoost: 2320 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

2023Core: 720 MHzBoost: 1560 MHz

RTX family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Radeon PRO W6800 vs RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation Performance Spectrum

Radeon PRO W6800

32 GB 250

20,270

0.0%

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

2 GB 70

20,669

+2.0%

GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design

GeForce GTX 980 Ti

GeForce RTX 2070

GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile

GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile

GeForce RTX 4090 D

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon PRO W6800 vs RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon PRO W6800 vs RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon PRO W6800

2021

Why buy it

✅65.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
❌
12.5% HIGHER MSRP
$2,249 MSRPvs$1,999 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.0 vs 10.3 G3D/$ ($2,249 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
❌257.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 70W.

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($1,999 MSRP vs $2,249 MSRP).
✅Delivers 14.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.3 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $2,249 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 70W instead of 250W, a 180W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon PRO W6800 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 65.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation instead at 20,669 vs 20,270, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: native frame generation with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while Radeon PRO W6800 has no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 7nm, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2021. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation makes the most sense to buy today. It is $250 cheaper on MSRP at $1,999 vs $2,249, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 14.7% (10.3 vs 9.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon PRO W6800 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon PRO W6800 vs RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon PRO W6800

The Radeon PRO W6800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2075 MHz to 2320 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,270 points. Launch price was $2,249.

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 720 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,669 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon PRO W6800 scores 20,270 and the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation reaches 20,669 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6800 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 6,144 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Raw compute: 17.82 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2320 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 48 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 192.

Feature	Radeon PRO W6800	RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
G3D Mark Score	20,270	20,669+2%
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	7 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	3840	6144+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)	17.82 TFLOPS	19.17 TFLOPS+8%
Boost Clock	2320 MHz+49%	1560 MHz
ROPs	96+50%	64
TMUs	240+25%	192
L1 Cache	0.75 MB	6 MB+700%
L2 Cache	4 MB	48 MB+1100%
Ray Tracing Cores	60+25%	48

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon PRO W6800 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W6800 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	Radeon PRO W6800	RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon PRO W6800 has 32 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation carries 2 GB. Radeon PRO W6800 gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 576 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 280 GB/s (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) — a 105.7% advantage for the Radeon PRO W6800. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W6800 and 160-bit on the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) — the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon PRO W6800	RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
VRAM Capacity	32 GB+1500%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6 ECC
Memory Bandwidth	576 GB/s+106%	280 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit+60%	160-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB	48 MB+1100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon PRO W6800	RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	6+50%	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation).

Feature	Radeon PRO W6800	RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Encoder	VCN 3.0	8th Gen NVENC (2x)
Decoder	VCN 3.0	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon PRO W6800 draws 250W versus the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation's 70W — a 112.5% difference. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 750W (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Radeon PRO W6800	RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
TDP	250W	70W-72%
Recommended PSU	650W-13%	750W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 8-pin
Length	267mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	80°C
Perf/Watt	81.1	295.3+264%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon PRO W6800 came in at $2249, while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation launched at $1999. On MSRP, RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation was 11.1% cheaper ($250 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.0 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 10.3 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) — the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation offers 14.4% better value. The newer card here is RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation (2023 vs 2021).

Feature	Radeon PRO W6800	RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
MSRP	$2249	$1999-11%
Performance per Dollar	9.0	10.3+14%
Codename	Navi 21	AD104
Release	June 8 2021	March 21 2023
Ranking	#74	#71

Search Radeon PRO W6800 on Amazon

Search RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.