Radeon PRO W6800 vs TITAN RTX
Radeon PRO W6800
Popular choices:
TITAN RTX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W6800
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon PRO W6800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (32 GB vs 24 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the TITAN RTX.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W6800 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 / 7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (32 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The TITAN RTX offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $1,203.96 versus $2,249 for the Radeon PRO W6800, it costs 46% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 85.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W6800 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+85.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,249) | ✅More affordable ($1,203.96) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W6800 and TITAN RTX
Radeon PRO W6800
The Radeon PRO W6800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2075 MHz to 2320 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,270 points. Launch price was $2,249.
TITAN RTX
The TITAN RTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 18 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 280W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,095 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W6800 scores 20,270 and the TITAN RTX reaches 20,095 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6800 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the TITAN RTX uses Turing, both on 7 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 4,608 (TITAN RTX). Raw compute: 17.82 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 16.31 TFLOPS (TITAN RTX). Boost clocks: 2320 MHz vs 1770 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 72 (TITAN RTX) vs 576.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,270 | 20,095 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840 | 4608+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 17.82 TFLOPS+9% | 16.31 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2320 MHz+31% | 1770 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 240 | 288+20% |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 4.5 MB+500% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60 | 72+20% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W6800 comes with 32 GB of VRAM, while the TITAN RTX has 24 GB. The Radeon PRO W6800 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 576 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 672 GB/s (TITAN RTX) — a 16.7% advantage for the TITAN RTX. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 6 MB (TITAN RTX) — the TITAN RTX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB+33% | 24 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 576 GB/s | 672 GB/s+17% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 12 Ultimate (TITAN RTX). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (TITAN RTX). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs NVDEC (4th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (TITAN RTX).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | NVENC (7th Gen) |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | NVDEC (4th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W6800 draws 250W versus the TITAN RTX's 280W — a 11.3% difference. The Radeon PRO W6800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 650W (TITAN RTX). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W-11% | 280W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 116mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 81.1+13% | 71.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W6800 launched at $2249 MSRP and currently averages $2249, while the TITAN RTX launched at $2499 and now averages $1203.96. The TITAN RTX costs 46.5% less ($1045 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.0 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 16.7 (TITAN RTX) — the TITAN RTX offers 85.6% better value. The Radeon PRO W6800 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2249-10% | $2499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2249 | $1203.96-46% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.0 | 16.7+86% |
| Codename | Navi 21 | TU102 |
| Release | June 8 2021 | December 18 2018 |
| Ranking | #74 | #91 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO W6800 and TITAN RTX
