Radeon PRO W6800
TITAN RTX
Radeon PRO W6800 vs TITAN RTX Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon PRO W6800 vs TITAN RTX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon PRO W6800 vs TITAN RTX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon PRO W6800
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($2,249 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 12.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 8.0 G3D/$ ($2,249 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 24 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than TITAN RTX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
TITAN RTX
2018Why buy it
- ✅6.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 24 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌11.1% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$2,249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.0 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $2,249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon PRO W6800 vs TITAN RTX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Radeon PRO W6800
The Radeon PRO W6800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2075 MHz to 2320 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,270 points. Launch price was $2,249.
TITAN RTX
The TITAN RTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 18 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 280W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,095 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W6800 scores 20,270 and the TITAN RTX reaches 20,095 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6800 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the TITAN RTX uses Turing, both on 7 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 4,608 (TITAN RTX). Raw compute: 17.82 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 16.31 TFLOPS (TITAN RTX). Boost clocks: 2320 MHz vs 1770 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 72 (TITAN RTX) vs 576.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,270 | 20,095 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840 | 4608+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 17.82 TFLOPS+9% | 16.31 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2320 MHz+31% | 1770 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 240 | 288+20% |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 4.5 MB+500% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60 | 72+20% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The TITAN RTX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W6800 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W6800 has 32 GB of VRAM, while the TITAN RTX carries 24 GB. Radeon PRO W6800 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 576 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 672 GB/s (TITAN RTX) — a 16.7% advantage for the TITAN RTX. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W6800 and 384-bit on the TITAN RTX. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 6 MB (TITAN RTX) — the TITAN RTX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB+33% | 24 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 576 GB/s | 672 GB/s+17% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 12 Ultimate (TITAN RTX). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (TITAN RTX). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs NVDEC (4th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (TITAN RTX).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | NVENC (7th Gen) |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | NVDEC (4th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W6800 draws 250W versus the TITAN RTX's 280W — a 11.3% difference. The Radeon PRO W6800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 650W (TITAN RTX). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W-11% | 280W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 116mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 81.1+13% | 71.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon PRO W6800 came in at $2249, while the TITAN RTX launched at $2499. On MSRP, Radeon PRO W6800 was 10% cheaper ($250 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.0 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 8.0 (TITAN RTX) — the Radeon PRO W6800 offers 12.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W6800 (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2249-10% | $2499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.0+13% | 8.0 |
| Codename | Navi 21 | TU102 |
| Release | June 8 2021 | December 18 2018 |
| Ranking | #74 | #91 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO W6800 and TITAN RTX
