Radeon PRO W6800
RTX A4500
Radeon PRO W6800 vs RTX A4500 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon PRO W6800 vs RTX A4500 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon PRO W6800 vs RTX A4500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon PRO W6800
2021Why buy it
- ✅47.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌32.4% HIGHER MSRP$2,249 MSRPvs$1,699 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.0 vs 12.4 G3D/$ ($2,249 MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
- ❌25% higher power demand at 250W vs 200W.
RTX A4500
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $550 less on MSRP ($1,699 MSRP vs $2,249 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 37.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.4 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($1,699 MSRP vs $2,249 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 250W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon PRO W6800 vs RTX A4500 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Radeon PRO W6800
The Radeon PRO W6800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2075 MHz to 2320 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,270 points. Launch price was $2,249.
RTX A4500
The RTX A4500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1050 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 7168 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,094 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W6800 scores 20,270 and the RTX A4500 reaches 21,094 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6800 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RTX A4500 uses Ampere, both on 7 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 7,168 (RTX A4500). Raw compute: 17.82 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 23.65 TFLOPS (RTX A4500). Boost clocks: 2320 MHz vs 1650 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 56 (RTX A4500) vs 224.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,270 | 21,094+4% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840 | 7168+87% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 17.82 TFLOPS | 23.65 TFLOPS+33% |
| Boost Clock | 2320 MHz+41% | 1650 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 240+7% | 224 |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 7 MB+833% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60+7% | 56 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A4500 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W6800 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W6800 has 32 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4500 carries 2 GB. Radeon PRO W6800 gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 576 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4500) — a 28.6% advantage for the Radeon PRO W6800. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W6800 and 192-bit on the RTX A4500. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 6 MB (RTX A4500) — the RTX A4500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB+1500% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 576 GB/s+29% | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 12.1 (RTX A4500). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A4500). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4500).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | 7th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W6800 draws 250W versus the RTX A4500's 200W — a 22.2% difference. The RTX A4500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 450W (RTX A4500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 200W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 450W-31% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 81.1 | 105.5+30% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon PRO W6800 came in at $2249, while the RTX A4500 launched at $1699. On MSRP, RTX A4500 was 24.5% cheaper ($550 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.0 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 12.4 (RTX A4500) — the RTX A4500 offers 37.8% better value.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2249 | $1699-24% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.0 | 12.4+38% |
| Codename | Navi 21 | GA102 |
| Release | June 8 2021 | November 23 2021 |
| Ranking | #74 | #68 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO W6800 and RTX A4500
