Radeon PRO W6800 vs RTX A4500
Radeon PRO W6800
Popular choices:
RTX A4500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W6800
Performance Per Dollar RTX A4500
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A4500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon PRO W6800 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W6800 | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.1%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 / 7nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (32 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (2 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The RTX A4500 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $800 versus $2,249 for the Radeon PRO W6800, it costs 64% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 192.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W6800 | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+192.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,249) | ✅More affordable ($800) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W6800 and RTX A4500
Radeon PRO W6800
The Radeon PRO W6800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2075 MHz to 2320 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,270 points. Launch price was $2,249.
RTX A4500
The RTX A4500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1050 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 7168 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,094 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W6800 scores 20,270 and the RTX A4500 reaches 21,094 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6800 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RTX A4500 uses Ampere, both on 7 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 7,168 (RTX A4500). Raw compute: 17.82 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 23.65 TFLOPS (RTX A4500). Boost clocks: 2320 MHz vs 1650 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 56 (RTX A4500) vs 224.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,270 | 21,094+4% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840 | 7168+87% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 17.82 TFLOPS | 23.65 TFLOPS+33% |
| Boost Clock | 2320 MHz+41% | 1650 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 240+7% | 224 |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 7 MB+833% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60+7% | 56 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W6800 comes with 32 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4500 has 2 GB. The Radeon PRO W6800 offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 576 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4500) — a 28.6% advantage for the Radeon PRO W6800. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 6 MB (RTX A4500) — the RTX A4500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB+1500% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 576 GB/s+29% | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 12.1 (RTX A4500). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A4500). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4500).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | 7th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W6800 draws 250W versus the RTX A4500's 200W — a 22.2% difference. The RTX A4500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 450W (RTX A4500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 200W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 450W-31% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 81.1 | 105.5+30% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W6800 launched at $2249 MSRP and currently averages $2249, while the RTX A4500 launched at $1699 and now averages $800. The RTX A4500 costs 64.4% less ($1449 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.0 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 26.4 (RTX A4500) — the RTX A4500 offers 193.3% better value.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | RTX A4500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2249 | $1699-24% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2249 | $800-64% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.0 | 26.4+193% |
| Codename | Navi 21 | GA102 |
| Release | June 8 2021 | November 23 2021 |
| Ranking | #74 | #68 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO W6800 and RTX A4500
