
Radeon PRO W6800

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Radeon PRO W6800 vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon PRO W6800 vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon PRO W6800 vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon PRO W6800
2021Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 16 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌42.9% higher power demand at 250W vs 175W.
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅6.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 175W instead of 250W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon PRO W6800 vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon PRO W6800
The Radeon PRO W6800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2075 MHz to 2320 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,270 points. Launch price was $2,249.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2550 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W6800 scores 20,270 and the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU reaches 20,312 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6800 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 12,800 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 17.82 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 2320 MHz vs 2550 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 100 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 400.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,270 | 20,312 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840 | 12800+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 17.82 TFLOPS | 65.28 TFLOPS+266% |
| Boost Clock | 2320 MHz | 2550 MHz+10% |
| ROPs | 96 | 176+83% |
| TMUs | 240 | 400+67% |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 12.5 MB+1567% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 72 MB+1700% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60 | 100+67% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon PRO W6800 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W6800 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 4) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W6800 has 32 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU carries 16 GB. Radeon PRO W6800 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W6800 and 256-bit on the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 72 MB (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB+100% | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 576 GB/s | 576 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 72 MB+1700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 12.2 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W6800 draws 250W versus the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU's 175W — a 35.3% difference. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 650W (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 175W-30% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 81.1 | 116.1+43% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6800 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2249 | — |
| Codename | Navi 21 | AD102 |
| Release | June 8 2021 | August 9 2023 |
| Ranking | #74 | #16 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














