Radeon PRO W6800 vs TITAN V

CPU

GPU

Radeon PRO W6800

2021Core: 2075 MHzBoost: 2320 MHz

Buy on Amazon

TITAN V

2017Core: 1200 MHzBoost: 1455 MHz

Buy on Amazon

Radeon PRO W6800 vs TITAN V Performance Spectrum

Radeon PRO W6800

32 GB 250

20,270

+1.0%

20,077

0.0%

GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design

GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)

GeForce GTX 1070 SLI

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile

GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile

RTX 5000 Ada Generation

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon PRO W6800 vs TITAN V FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon PRO W6800 vs TITAN V: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon PRO W6800

2021

Why buy it

✅24.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $750 less on MSRP ($2,249 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 34.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 6.7 G3D/$ ($2,249 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 12 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

TITAN V

2017

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with 12 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
33.3% HIGHER MSRP
$2,999 MSRPvs$2,249 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.7 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $2,249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon PRO W6800 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 24.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1% in PassMark G3D (20,270 vs 20,077), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon PRO W6800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 32 GB vs 12 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 12nm, and 60 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon PRO W6800 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $750 cheaper on MSRP at $2,249 vs $2,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 34.6% (9.0 vs 6.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon PRO W6800 vs TITAN V Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon PRO W6800

The Radeon PRO W6800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2075 MHz to 2320 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,270 points. Launch price was $2,249.

TITAN V

The TITAN V is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2017. It features the Volta architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1455 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,077 points. Launch price was $2,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon PRO W6800 scores 20,270 and the TITAN V reaches 20,077 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6800 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the TITAN V uses Volta, both on 7 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 5,120 (TITAN V). Raw compute: 17.82 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 14.9 TFLOPS (TITAN V). Boost clocks: 2320 MHz vs 1455 MHz.

Feature	Radeon PRO W6800	TITAN V
G3D Mark Score	20,270	20,077
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	Volta
Process Node	7 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	3840	5120+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	17.82 TFLOPS+20%	14.9 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2320 MHz+59%	1455 MHz
ROPs	96	96
TMUs	240	320+33%
L1 Cache	0.75 MB	7.5 MB+900%
L2 Cache	4 MB	4.5 MB+13%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon PRO W6800	TITAN V
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon PRO W6800 has 32 GB of VRAM, while the TITAN V carries 12 GB. Radeon PRO W6800 gives you 166.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 576 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 653 GB/s (TITAN V) — a 13.4% advantage for the TITAN V. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W6800 and 3072-bit on the TITAN V. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 4.5 MB (TITAN V) — the TITAN V has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon PRO W6800	TITAN V
VRAM Capacity	32 GB+167%	12 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	HBM2
Memory Bandwidth	576 GB/s	653 GB/s+13%
Bus Width	256-bit	3072-bit+1100%
L2 Cache	4 MB	4.5 MB+13%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 12.1 (TITAN V). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon PRO W6800	TITAN V
DirectX	12.2	12.1
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	6+50%	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs NVENC 6.0 (TITAN V). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (TITAN V).

Feature	Radeon PRO W6800	TITAN V
Encoder	VCN 3.0	NVENC 6.0
Decoder	VCN 3.0	PureVideo HD VP9
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon PRO W6800 draws 250W versus the TITAN V's 250W — a 0% difference. The TITAN V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 600W (TITAN V). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

Feature	Radeon PRO W6800	TITAN V
TDP	250W	250W
Recommended PSU	650W	600W-8%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 8-pin
Length	267mm	267mm
Height	111mm	112mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	80°C-6%	85°C
Perf/Watt	81.1	80.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon PRO W6800 came in at $2249, while the TITAN V launched at $2999. On MSRP, Radeon PRO W6800 was 25% cheaper ($750 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.0 (Radeon PRO W6800) vs 6.7 (TITAN V) — the Radeon PRO W6800 offers 34.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W6800 (2021 vs 2017).

Feature	Radeon PRO W6800	TITAN V
MSRP	$2249-25%	$2999
Performance per Dollar	9.0+34%	6.7
Codename	Navi 21	GV100
Release	June 8 2021	December 7 2017
Ranking	#74	#109

Search Radeon PRO W6800 on Amazon

Search TITAN V on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.