Radeon RX 6750 XT vs RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Radeon RX 6750 XT
Popular choices:
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6750 XT
Performance Per Dollar RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 6750 XT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score and 500% more VRAM (12 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6750 XT | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (2 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 6750 XT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $320 versus $1,450 for the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, it costs 78% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 353.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6750 XT | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+353.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($320) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,450) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6750 XT and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Radeon RX 6750 XT
The Radeon RX 6750 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 3 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2150 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,686 points. Launch price was $549.
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 720 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,669 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 6750 XT scores 20,686 and the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation reaches 20,669 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6750 XT is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 6,144 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Raw compute: 13.31 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2600 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 48 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 192.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 XT | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,686 | 20,669 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 6144+140% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 13.31 TFLOPS | 19.17 TFLOPS+44% |
| Boost Clock | 2600 MHz+67% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160 | 192+20% |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 6 MB+1100% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 48 MB+1500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40 | 48+20% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support modern Frame Generation technology, allowing them to insert intermediate frames to smoothen motion and boost perceived FPS in supported games.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 XT | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 6750 XT comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has 2 GB. The Radeon RX 6750 XT offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 432 GB/s (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 280 GB/s (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) — a 54.3% advantage for the Radeon RX 6750 XT. Bus width: 192-bit vs 160-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) — the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 XT | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+500% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 ECC |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432 GB/s+54% | 280 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+20% | 160-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 48 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 XT | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only),VP9 (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 XT | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only),VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6750 XT draws 250W versus the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation's 70W — a 112.5% difference. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 750W (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 XT | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 70W-72% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-13% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 82.7 | 295.3+257% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6750 XT launched at $549 MSRP and currently averages $320, while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation launched at $1999 and now averages $1450. The Radeon RX 6750 XT costs 77.9% less ($1130 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 64.6 (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 14.3 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) — the Radeon RX 6750 XT offers 351.7% better value. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 XT | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-73% | $1999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $320-78% | $1450 |
| Performance per Dollar | 64.6+352% | 14.3 |
| Codename | Navi 22 | AD104 |
| Release | March 3 2022 | March 21 2023 |
| Ranking | #70 | #71 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 6750 XT and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
