Radeon RX 6750 XT
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Radeon RX 6750 XT vs RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon RX 6750 XT vs RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon RX 6750 XT vs RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon RX 6750 XT
2022Why buy it
- ✅33.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,450 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 264.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.7 vs 10.3 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 70W.
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 250W, a 180W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6750 XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌264.1% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$549 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.3 vs 37.7 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 6750 XT vs RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Radeon RX 6750 XT
The Radeon RX 6750 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 3 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2150 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,686 points. Launch price was $549.
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 720 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,669 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 6750 XT scores 20,686 and the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation reaches 20,669 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6750 XT is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 6,144 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Raw compute: 13.31 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2600 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 48 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 192.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 XT | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,686 | 20,669 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 6144+140% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 13.31 TFLOPS | 19.17 TFLOPS+44% |
| Boost Clock | 2600 MHz+67% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160 | 192+20% |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 6 MB+1100% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 48 MB+1500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40 | 48+20% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support Frame Generation, but the Radeon RX 6750 XT is on the newer stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF, while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation stays on DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 6750 XT leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 XT | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 6750 XT has 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation carries 2 GB. Radeon RX 6750 XT gives you 500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 432 GB/s (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 280 GB/s (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) — a 54.3% advantage for the Radeon RX 6750 XT. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the Radeon RX 6750 XT and 160-bit on the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) — the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 XT | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+500% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 ECC |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432 GB/s+54% | 280 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+20% | 160-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 48 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 XT | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only),VP9 (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 XT | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only),VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6750 XT draws 250W versus the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation's 70W — a 112.5% difference. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 750W (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 XT | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 70W-72% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-13% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 82.7 | 295.3+257% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon RX 6750 XT came in at $549, while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation launched at $1999. On MSRP, Radeon RX 6750 XT was 72.5% cheaper ($1450 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 37.7 (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 10.3 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) — the Radeon RX 6750 XT offers 266% better value. The newer card here is RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 XT | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-73% | $1999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.7+266% | 10.3 |
| Codename | Navi 22 | AD104 |
| Release | March 3 2022 | March 21 2023 |
| Ranking | #70 | #71 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 6750 XT and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
