
Radeon RX 6750 XT

RTX A5500
Radeon RX 6750 XT vs RTX A5500 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon RX 6750 XT vs RTX A5500 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon RX 6750 XT vs RTX A5500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon RX 6750 XT
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,051 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 542.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.7 vs 5.9 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A5500 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
RTX A5500
2022Why buy it
- ✅30.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Radeon RX 6750 XT is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌555.7% HIGHER MSRP$3,600 MSRPvs$549 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.9 vs 37.7 G3D/$ ($3,600 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 6750 XT vs RTX A5500 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon RX 6750 XT
The Radeon RX 6750 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 3 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2150 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,686 points. Launch price was $549.

RTX A5500
The RTX A5500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1080 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 10240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,108 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 6750 XT scores 20,686 and the RTX A5500 reaches 21,108 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6750 XT is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RTX A5500 uses Ampere, both on 7 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 10,240 (RTX A5500). Raw compute: 13.31 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 34.1 TFLOPS (RTX A5500). Boost clocks: 2600 MHz vs 1665 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 80 (RTX A5500) vs 320.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 XT | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,686 | 21,108+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 10240+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 13.31 TFLOPS | 34.1 TFLOPS+156% |
| Boost Clock | 2600 MHz+56% | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 160 | 320+100% |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 10 MB+1900% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 6 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40 | 80+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6750 XT is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The RTX A5500 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX A5500 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 6750 XT leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 XT | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 6750 XT has 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A5500 carries 24 GB. RTX A5500 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 432 GB/s (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 768 GB/s (RTX A5500) — a 77.8% advantage for the RTX A5500. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the Radeon RX 6750 XT and 384-bit on the RTX A5500. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 6 MB (RTX A5500) — the RTX A5500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 XT | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 24 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432 GB/s | 768 GB/s+78% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 6 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 12.1 (RTX A5500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 XT | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A5500). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only),VP9 (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A5500).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 XT | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | 7th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only),VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6750 XT draws 250W versus the RTX A5500's 230W — a 8.3% difference. The RTX A5500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 450W (RTX A5500). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 XT | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 230W-8% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 450W-31% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 82.7 | 91.8+11% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon RX 6750 XT came in at $549, while the RTX A5500 launched at $3600. On MSRP, Radeon RX 6750 XT was 84.8% cheaper ($3051 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 37.7 (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 5.9 (RTX A5500) — the Radeon RX 6750 XT offers 539% better value.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6750 XT | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-85% | $3600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.7+539% | 5.9 |
| Codename | Navi 22 | GA102 |
| Release | March 3 2022 | March 22 2022 |
| Ranking | #70 | #67 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














