Radeon RX 6750 XT vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

AMD

Radeon RX 6750 XT

2022Core: 2150 MHzBoost: 2600 MHz
RX family
·······
VS
NVIDIA

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

2023Core: 1290 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
RTX family
·······

Radeon RX 6750 XT vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon RX 6750 XT vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon RX 6750 XT vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon RX 6750 XT

2022

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
  • 127.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 110W.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

2023

Why buy it

  • 15.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 110W instead of 250W, a 140W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 37.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $549 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 15.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 7.2% in PassMark G3D (22,167 vs 20,686), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 7nm, 58 vs 40 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2022. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 6750 XT makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and strong 1440p, Radeon RX 6750 XT is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and strong 1440p headroom, RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon RX 6750 XT vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon RX 6750 XT

The Radeon RX 6750 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 3 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2150 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,686 points. Launch price was $549.

NVIDIA

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 7424 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 58 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,167 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 6750 XT scores 20,686 versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile's 22,167 — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile leads by 7.2%. The Radeon RX 6750 XT is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 7,424 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Raw compute: 13.31 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 24.72 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Boost clocks: 2600 MHz vs 1665 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 58 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 232.

FeatureRadeon RX 6750 XTRTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
G3D Mark Score
20,686
22,167+7%
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Ada Lovelace
Process Node
7 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
2560
7424+190%
Compute (TFLOPS)
13.31 TFLOPS
24.72 TFLOPS+86%
Boost Clock
2600 MHz+56%
1665 MHz
ROPs
64
80+25%
TMUs
160
232+45%
L1 Cache
0.5 MB
7.3 MB+1360%
L2 Cache
3 MB
48 MB+1500%
Ray Tracing Cores
40
58+45%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both cards support Frame Generation, but the Radeon RX 6750 XT is on the newer stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile stays on DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 6750 XT leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureRadeon RX 6750 XTRTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
Upscaling Tech
FSR 3
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 12 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the Radeon RX 6750 XT and 192-bit on the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon RX 6750 XTRTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
VRAM Capacity
12 GB
12 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
432 GB/s
432 GB/s
Bus Width
192-bit
192-bit
L2 Cache
3 MB
48 MB+1500%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.

FeatureRadeon RX 6750 XTRTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+300%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only),VP9 (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile).

FeatureRadeon RX 6750 XTRTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
Encoder
VCN 3.0
8th Gen NVENC
Decoder
VCN 3.0
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only),VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 6750 XT draws 250W versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile's 110W — a 77.8% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon RX 6750 XT) vs 150W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

FeatureRadeon RX 6750 XTRTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
TDP
250W
110W-56%
Recommended PSU
650W
150W-77%
Power Connector
6-pin + 8-pin
Mobile
Length
267mm
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
80°C
80°C
Perf/Watt
82.7
201.5+144%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile (2023 vs 2022).

FeatureRadeon RX 6750 XTRTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
MSRP
$549
Codename
Navi 22
AD104
Release
March 3 2022
March 21 2023
Ranking
#70
#64

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.