RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile vs GeForce GTX 1650
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is significantly newer (2025 vs 2019). The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 115.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.
| Insight | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+115.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-115.3%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell / 5nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile and GeForce GTX 1650
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 19 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 952 MHz to 1657 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,940 points.
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile scores 16,940 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile leads by 115.3%. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,328 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 11.03 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1657 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,940+115% | 7,869 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3328+271% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.03 TFLOPS+270% | 2.984 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1657 MHz | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 104+86% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 3.3 MB+275% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+3100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+3100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.
| Feature | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 3+200% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: 6th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).
| Feature | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 9th Gen NVENC | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) |
| Decoder | 6th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile draws 45W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 50% difference. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-40% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 300W-54% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 0mm | 229mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 376.4+259% | 104.9 |
Value Analysis
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $149 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $75 |
| Codename | GB206 | TU117 |
| Release | March 19 2025 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #156 | #323 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile and GeForce GTX 1650
